GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum
http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
General Category >> General Board >> Re: Evolution Simplified
http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1258668286

Message started by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 19th, 2009 at 9:27pm

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 19th, 2009 at 9:27pm

wrote on Nov 19th, 2009 at 3:04pm:
Heredity.
Just look at the goddamn Baldwin brothers.


Heredity has noting to do with the theory of evolution because all I have seen is a horse becomes a horse, a dog is always a dog, a lizard becomes another lizard,  a fish is always a fish, a human is always a human.  If it turns into something else then it would "evolve".  If you can't show any changes into a new genus or even an extremely modified version with pronounced improvements of the same creature then you could show evolution.  However, there is no evidence for this.  A tiny horse becoming a large horse is still a horse.  In actual fact the tiny horse ancient "horse" was much more advanced and complex and from the bone structure was able to walk on different types of terrain. It had multiple bones in the legs, whereas the newer horse has one set of bones going down in a single line of joints.  That is de-evolution with exceptional limitations from the degradation.


Quote:
   Mutation.
Glimpses of this in "adaptation". DNA changes.


There is no such thing as net positive mutation in the DNA.  It is not "mutation" if it is just the expression of the DNA passed to the offspring.  And any changes in the DNA have never shown any form of evolution, only degradation and de-evolution.  I have read many more papers on this than you have obviously because all you get is creatures adapting to survive as the same creatures and de-evolution from screwed up changes to the DNA coding. There is no other evidence in the DNA.


Quote:
Competition.
Limited resources to fight for. Predators. Prey. Cold. Hot. The world is rough.


All I have seen in the fossil record is de-evolution and extinction not evolution.  If you can show any absolute evidence for evolution besides this. Competition does not equate to evolution.  It equates to stabilization of the fit and not allowing the weak to reproduce.   Golly Gee MR Wizard! Get free of this crap.  Natural occurrences in breeding, like the big dog gets to mate is just more of the "programming" for survival of a species as the same species, but strong.  Any adaptations are for the same purpose, OBVOUSLY.



Quote:
These 3 things are perfectly demonstrable and they ARE evolution.


Opinions are never evidence. Take a look at what is really happening and stop this fantasy.

"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be." Albert Einstein

"Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either."
Albert Einstein

"A person starts to live when he can live outside himself."  Albert Einstein

"Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character." Albert Einstein
(If you are not a guardian over your mind, you will succumb to other people's HEMG)

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."  Albert Einstein

"Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true." The Buddha [paraphrased]


"Just because everybody on earth believes something does not make it true" James Arjuna

"The obvious isn't obvious until it becomes obvious." James Arjuna

"Make seeking the truth your priority over anything else.  If you are not seeking the truth then you are seeking to perpetuate your HEMG beliefs." James Arjuna
HorseEvolution.jpg (162 KB | 458 )

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by Start Simple on Nov 19th, 2009 at 11:10pm

Quote:
Heredity has noting to do with the theory of evolution because all I have seen is a horse becomes a horse, a dog is always a dog, a lizard becomes another lizard,  a fish is always a fish, a human is always a human.  If it turns into something else then it would "evolve".  If you can't show any changes into a new genus or even an extremely modified version of the same creature then you could show evolution.  However, there is no evidence for this.  A tiny horse becoming a large horse is still a horse.  In actual fact the tiny horse was much more complex and from the bone structure was able to walk on different types of terrain. It had multiple bones in the legs, whereas the newer horse has one set of bones going down in a single line of joints.  That is de-evolution.

It's called descent with modification. Your personal lack of observation is meaningless in this matter. And so is your lack of imagination. It is simple and logical to understand that lots of little changes amount to a big change. Lots of little steps will take you 1000 miles. This is elementary.


Quote:
There is no such thing as net positive mutation in the DNA.  It is not "mutation" if it is just the expression of the DNA passed to the offspring.  And any changes in the DNA have never shown any form of evolution, only degradation and de-evolution.  I have read many more papers on this than you have obviously because all you get is creatures adapting to survive as the same creatures and de-evolution from screwed up changes to the DNA coding. There is no other evidence in the DNA.

Lie.


Quote:
It is not mutation if it is just the expression of the DNA passed to the offspring.

So a child receiving two copies of the same gene is an "expression"?. HAha.. aww all this laughing is an incredible ab workout.
No. It's a mutation. Mutation is fact. You ever hear of Down's syndrome? Yeah, that's a mutation. Two parents without that problem can produce offspring with EXTRA DNA. This is a mutation. It did not exist in either parent. This is an irrefutable fact.


Quote:
Competition does not equate to evolution.

Of course it doesn't. Mutations produce the new genes. Competition provides a filter. Good mutations become more frequent in the population. You've admitted this occurs. We've documented it in moths and birds. It's a fact. Given more time this process produces all of the variety we see today.

None of those quotes support your position or your mindset. None of them are advocating being woefully ignorant or ignoring a mass of scientific achievement that is better supported than anything else humanity has ever produced.

Seriously. Your objections to Heredity, Mutation and Competition are completely ridiculous. Do you have ANY serious or insightful concerns about those topics?


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 20th, 2009 at 1:15am
http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1258221984

Read this post and listen to the videos if you really want to learn how to be a free thinker.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by Start Simple on Nov 20th, 2009 at 7:15am
I presented a simplified and coherent state of the theory. That's what the scientific community has so far assembled.

Do you have any SPECIFIC objections that aren't based on your personal lack of observation or your personal unwillingness to believe lots of small changes equal big change.

I see a lot of hand-waving about belief and whatnot but you haven't presented any challenge to the theory.

Heredity, Mutation, Competition. They're all perfectly real. They produce evolution.

Spare me all the lecture about being indoctrinated. I guess I've also been indoctrinated about physics and chemistry and the shape of the earth and the solar system and mathematics and engineering.  ::)

If you don't have any valid points I guess we're done here.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 20th, 2009 at 10:00am

wrote on Nov 20th, 2009 at 7:15am:
I presented a simplified and coherent state of the theory. That's what the scientific community has so far assembled.

Do you have any SPECIFIC objections that aren't based on your personal lack of observation or your personal unwillingness to believe lots of small changes equal big change.

I see a lot of hand-waving about belief and whatnot but you haven't presented any challenge to the theory.

Heredity, Mutation, Competition. They're all perfectly real. They produce evolution.

Spare me all the lecture about being indoctrinated. I guess I've also been indoctrinated about physics and chemistry and the shape of the earth and the solar system and mathematics and engineering.  ::)

If you don't have any valid points I guess we're done here.


These two videos are based on absolutely irrefutable DNA evidence that cannot be denied, except by religious belief in Evodelusionism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emPINOUlfnE


Let me repeat;  There is no evidence that even suggest evolution in all the 20,000 papers I have read on this.
DNA does not support evolution. Speciation does not support evolution. The ERV's do not support evolution. The fossil record is a friggin mess and even so it does not show evolution.

I have no religion.  I only go with what is real and obvious.

When people are brainwashed by all that has happened to them in life, it is subtle and powerful.  I have been able to stay away from that by all the events and my responses to those events ,by standing back and observing, studying all sides of anything.  Having no agenda but to seek the truth is my life in a nutshell.
My father taught me at a very early age to never believe anyone, no matter who they are, because they all have agendas. He told me this because his father was a fundamentalist who taught with a stick and child abuse.
My father has never been wrong.  People's agendas stick out to me like a "sore thumb". When you don't have any agenda but to seek truth and to be truthful, other people with agendas are obvious.

If you want to know the truth, you have to be absolutely honest with yourself. 

"Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true." The Buddha [paraphrased]

This is the same philosophy my father gave me.

In real science you use the scientific method and you test things over and over until it becomes obvious and you get real results every time.  In my field I can send a diagram of a schematic to china and have it built.  I can sent the same diagram to Indonesia and have it built.  I can send it anywhere and if they do what is told in the drawings and diagrams all of the circuit boards will work the same.  If there is a flaw in the design they will all have the same flaw.  This is real science.

When I was a child I witnessed and atomic blast while traveling through Nevada.  That is pretty absolute evidnece of the power contained in atoms.

Some paleontologist who is brainwashed into believe that evolution is real, is not evidence, because they force their agenda on the evidence, ruining all objectivity. This is why we need only DNA in these specimens to see any genetic links at all.  You cannot trust these fanatical brainwashed, religious people with your mind.  This is so damned obvious that it is hard for me to even begin to understand how you would fall for that garbage.

You cannot even come up with a scientific method to test any of this belief, so it can't be proven or disproved because you cannot test it.  There is absolutely no way to use the scientific method on a religious belief.  That is why there is no evidence for evolution.

The need to know how life got here is the cause of all sorts of human suffering and religions that kill in the name of God.
That is not an excuse to have another screwed up religion forced into science.  Mythology has been in science for thousands of years. It has never left.  It is the same as it ever was.  IF there is anyway for some messed up belief to be propagated it would only be in socially accepted authority (science) or by powerful religions who rely on money. This is historically how myths are propagated and children are indoctrinated. Children naturally want to conform, and that is thier downfall and weakness.

I have never been like that, I find it repulsive to give my intelligence over to some other person's nonsense.

The answer is that there is no need to know how life got here, or how life goes on, if all you can come up with is religious bovine garbage.  This goes for all of you.

If you have no evidence to back up something, stop filling in the blanks with delusional beliefs that have no basis in science.  Don't call it science when it really is a religion.

Don't ever compare a mythological religion to real functional science.  It degrades science. This crap is the worst form of indoctrination and bovine crap I have ever come across in science.

I waited until I had every part of this understood before coming out with the truth on this subject. If you really need to go over every DNA evidence, and fossil evidence, ERV's and all those screwed up beliefs I can do that for you.

But if you have not learned how to stand back and see your own beliefs being projected, by now, you will probably go to the end of your life with all your delusions in tact. That is a sad life.


Unlike people who believe things, I am capable of looking at the evidence for what it is. With no prejudices. And I never believe anyone until I test everything they have to say.

There is nothing but belief projected on evidence in Evodelusionism.

The fossil record with all the categorizing has no value if you have no DNA to support the delusional observer who is putting his stamp of belief on all the specimens.  Humans are inherently flawed in this way.  They force belief on everything.  They do this because they are weak and not able to stand back and just be objective. They want to ONLY show the belief in everything they touch. They do this so much so that students are never given any of the obvious and real contradictions that are prevalent in this nonsense.  They are never taught to look at all the evidence, but only the evidence that suggest evolution.

I know this because the students are totally unaware of any of this, until I tell them.

This is why all the fossil evidence is tainted, dirty, and basically worthless until we find new tools to really understand what has been in he past.  Right now this is a total unknown.  There is no way to tie any fossil to any other fossil other than observation and that observation is tainted by brainwashed believers.  Once you have belief you have no credibility as a scientist.

---------------------------

There is no Mutation in DNA, only replication of gene expression and adaption.

Mutation is only referenced to messed up chromosomes.


If an offspring has messed up chromosomes they never make it into the gene pool as a "species" because they don't breed.  If they do breed the offspring has sexual dysfunction and so the "species" stops.  I have read at least 10 papers on this. This is why we have no race of Downs Syndrome people. There is no such thing as mutation causing a new genus.

In the physical record of all the evidence we have there exists nothing that supports evolution.

It is a fairy tale that small changed from generation to generation equal large changes over some immense time.
There is absolutely no evidence of this in the fossil record, as messed up as it is.  We see a lot of dead ends where the creatures cease to have the ability to adapt beyond the limits of their genetic structures.  This is fact.  There is no trail between fossils only huge gaps that are filled in with belief. One delusional "Professor" said to his students: "Don't worry about the gaps, just have faith and belief in the science!"  No kidding and this weak human is teaching students?

When you are brainwashed you are let to believe by inference and implication that "Small changes must show evolution".   The problem is we have no scientific data to back that concept, so it is only belief projected on what you evodelusionists think is happening. That makes it a myth and fairytale.

It is time for you to grow up and let go of the Santa Clause idea of this Myth of Evolution.

Do you have absolute evidence of any creature ever making huge changes to their genetic structure over any length of time?  Back off on the belief and go look for this evidence.
If you can find any interpretation of  evidence that is not tainted with belief, then you are not a scientist.

If you can find any interpretation of  evidence for evolution that is NOT tainted with belief, then you are not a scientist. A real scientist is objective and has no beliefs.
So, far the "elephant in the room" in all papers on this pseudo science is this faith and belief that evolution must be true, but that is all I have read in the 28,000 papers on evolution and biology.  Using the word "evolution" hundreds of billions of times does not make it real.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by Start Simple on Nov 20th, 2009 at 10:38am

Quote:
There is no evidence that even suggest evolution in all the 20,000 papers I have read on this.

Riiiight. The world is flat! the world is flat!


Quote:
There is no Mutation in DNA, only replication of gene expression and adaption.

Mutation IN DNA? That doesn't even make sense. What the hell are you talking about. DNA mutates. It changes. It's a string of nucleotides that physically changes. Stop saying this. It's a lie. You repeat this over and over.
"only replication of gene expression and adaption" -- WHAT?!?! This makes no sense. Replication OF expression? Do you know what gene expression is? It's a process. It's not an object, it can't be "replicated". What are you talking about?
And adaptation is a product of Heredity, Mutation, and Competition.

Don't just type pages and pages of your rhetoric. We've seriously gone nowhere.
Get specific.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 20th, 2009 at 12:35pm

Quote:
Don't just type pages and pages of your rhetoric. We've seriously gone nowhere.
Get specific.


I have been extremely specific, but you are obviously not reading anything I have taught you.

When humans reproduce there are no "mutations" between the parents and the offspring.  This is because mutations are harmful, 99.96% of the time.

Again, this video is from the National Medical Library.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI

What part of this video do you not understand. This is the only way mutations work and they are 99.9999% deleterious to the creatures.  When they live with this mutation it will be transmitted to the offspring and degrade the whole species as it transmits through interbreeding, and it is particularly bad when both parents have the same mutation. That is why close relatives cannot breed any longer.

There is only genetic information being transmitted to the offspring. The meshing of two people's DNA and passing traits on to the child is not evolution.  It is the continuation of a species.  Mutations are bad, they ONLY destroy existing correct DNA coding that used to produce good cells.

The geneticists are too lazy to do the research in the past to see the combinations of gene expression in the ancestors of the child, so they call them "random mutations", because they are promoting a religion.

You are the one who is going nowhere, because you have not produced any evidence.

You do not understand the difference between real evidence and belief.

Get rid of the belief and start over reading what I have taught you so far. When you can respond to my teachings then I will know you still have a brain.

I have high hopes for anyone who comes across my path that they will be changed from the experience and grow some intellectual muscles.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by Start Simple on Nov 20th, 2009 at 12:59pm
You arms getting tired from all of the handwaving?  ;)

Your one line arguments against Heredity, Mutation, and Competition have been less than stellar.
Do you have any compelling arguments?

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:11pm

wrote on Nov 20th, 2009 at 12:59pm:
You arms getting tired from all of the handwaving?  ;)

Your one line arguments against Heredity, Mutation, and Competition have been less than stellar.
Do you have any compelling arguments?


You have to be a nut case to think that heredity "proves" evolution.  It is not even an argument.

Can you explain to everyone here how it is possible for a rational person to think heredity has any implication of evolution, since there exists not a crumb of evidence for this fantasy?

Start there.  Just answer this completely then we will go back over the "mutation" bovine garbage and the "competition bovine garbage".

This had better be detailed and complete, with all your evidence to back it. :D

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:13pm
While you are at it,you need to listen to all these videos and
read the comments.   ;D

http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1258221984

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 21st, 2009 at 11:50am

wrote on Nov 20th, 2009 at 12:59pm:
You arms getting tired from all of the handwaving?  ;)

Your one line arguments against Heredity, Mutation, and Competition have been less than stellar.
Do you have any compelling arguments?


Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.

So far,  you have not proven anything to me except that you see things that are not there.

There is nothing in "heridity" that proves or even suggests evolution. 

I told you to first show us the obvious and irrefutable evidence that "heredity" shows evolution WITHOUT any opinions from experts.

You can't do that, because IT IS only an opinion and nothing else. There is no evidence to show this ties to any evolution.



Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by FackCheck on Nov 22nd, 2009 at 11:52am

Quote:
that "heredity" shows evolution

They never claimed heredity showed evolution. They said it was one part evolution.

How hope you didn't read all of those thousands of papers with that kind of reading comprehension.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 22nd, 2009 at 2:06pm

wrote on Nov 22nd, 2009 at 11:52am:

Quote:
that "heredity" shows evolution

They never claimed heredity showed evolution. They said it was one part evolution.

How hope you didn't read all of those thousands of papers with that kind of reading comprehension.


Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.

GoodScience Said:

The idea that heredity shows any part of evolution is NOT proven and is a crappity smacking opinion; Thus it is not usable evidence.
When you go through all the "evidence" it is all the same feculence. Belief projected with messed up opinions of screwed up believers in this crap religion of Evodelusionism.

If you can't see that, you need to go back and study all of your papers and realize that opinions by believers is not science, it is an HEMG religion.

What evidence do you want to bring up that you think is real evidence and not opinions by some cult member?

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Apr 5th, 2011 at 7:04am

Quote:
You cannot even come up with a scientific method to test any of this belief, so it can't be proven or disproved because you cannot test it.


Can you please lead by example and explain an infallable method of testing gravity on all scales so that I can use your response as a template to how you would like your answer presented?

This will leave less room for interpretation error.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 6th, 2011 at 12:38am

ProofMan wrote on Apr 5th, 2011 at 7:04am:

Quote:
You cannot even come up with a scientific method to test any of this belief, so it can't be proven or disproved because you cannot test it.


Can you please lead by example and explain an infallable method of testing gravity on all scales so that I can use your response as a template to how you would like your answer presented?

This will leave less room for interpretation error.


ProofMan wrote on Apr 5th, 2011 at 7:04am:

Quote:
You cannot even come up with a scientific method to test any of this belief, so it can't be proven or disproved because you cannot test it.


Can you please lead by example and explain an infallable method of testing gravity on all scales so that I can use your response as a template to how you would like your answer presented?

This will leave less room for interpretation error.



Gravity is a law of science.  It operates exactly the same in an absolutely predictable way under the same exact conditions.  This cannot be falsified.  In every real science we can eventually predict all outcomes, if we understand all the conditions and have ways of testing it.  So far we have seen gravity work the same under the same conditions for as long as we have studied it.

There is nothing about gravity that relates to religious ideology. 

Event the lottery is predictable, if you have ways of understanding all of the scientific phenomenon surrounding the balls coming out of the machine.

Evodelusionism is a religion because it never happens ever.

It is based on magical ideas projected on the physical world and now that we have all the physical evidence against it we can disregard it.

As long as we did not have the physical evidence of the world being close to a spherical shape, the belief in a flat world was the common belief.  Even after the evidence was presented and it was obvious to those who understood it and allowed themselves to understand it;  it was fought against, even until the late 1890's.

This idea of simple life evolving has no evidence whatsoever.

Not one time as a bacteria ever gained in complexity.  It has not gained in cells that perform different functions. All it does is digest carbon based matter and make enzymes. Yet the Evotards always say that bacteria has evolved. 

How can people be that stupid?   



Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Apr 6th, 2011 at 1:48am

Quote:
Evodelusionism is a religion because it never happens ever.

Much like a belief in a God.


Quote:
It is based on magical ideas projected on the physical world and now that we have all the physical evidence against it we can disregard it.

You claim De-Evolution happens, if created by a god why would this be a part of a creatures design? Pretty bad designer in my eyes.



Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 6th, 2011 at 2:26am

ProofMan wrote on Apr 6th, 2011 at 1:48am:

Quote:
Evodelusionism is a religion because it never happens ever.

Much like a belief in a God.

[quote]It is based on magical ideas projected on the physical world and now that we have all the physical evidence against it we can disregard it.

You claim De-Evolution happens, if created by a god why would this be a part of a creatures design? Pretty bad designer in my eyes.


[/quote]

Many of the Evotards evaluate God's design this way.  "Well that laryngeal nerve is a bad design."

I don't think it represents the original design condition nor intent. And even so the speed of electric pulses in a nerve are in microseconds even at 50 yards long, so it is not a concern and doesn't stop life. It fully functions and the creature being able to live pretty well is evidence of that.

The original design has been "DE-EVOLVED" into a condition of less fitness and less ideal as with all creatures that are set free on this planet.

If you realize that all of the extinct creatures met up with a DE-Evolved from the original design flaw that would not allow them to live.

That is a funny statement.   I don't make up the evidence.  I just point it out.  There is no way for you to understand what is good or bad except by your extremely limited beliefs and your prejudices based on your humanness, fears, limitations etc.

There is no good or bad in reality.  It is part of the human mind and nothing else.  I don't see dogs describing good or bad. I don't see any other creature who has this idea.
Good or Bad is relativity in action. It is the foundation of it.

What is good is relative to what a human "wants" to represent good.  The Islamic Terroists, find that killing off 3000 Americans to be "really good". 

In yoga we realize that Good and Bad are two poles of the same delusion.  Yogis are asked to focus on one pole only and allow the other to die in your mind and soul. Then "good" will also vanish, because it "requires" bad to exist. Then all that is left is perfection and perfect objective awareness.

I see that survival seems to be the main driving force in creatures. Where did that come from?

I see amazing intricate and extremely complex structures in creatures that could never have been produced by what we know now. We know that mutations are 70 to 1 deleterious.

There is no way for evolution to exist with those odds.
Anytime you take an existing functional protean and mess with it you make it weaker or nonfunctional or cause death.

The idea of "random mutations" is like crashing your car, and then some magical mutation fairy comes along and fixes the smashed in parts with no help from any repair people.

The only thing that is going to save us is the designer. PERIOD. So get used to that.

The designer is so far beyond human comprehension that it is funny to see all the forms people have projected in order to approach this thing they call God.

God is not comprehended by the human mind.

We attempt with our feeble mind to make up ideas but they are never really what God is.

We attempt to judge the world of design with our feeble minds.   
"That is a poor design". 

That is how it is....period.  Accept it, so you can deal with it and try to educate humanity on how frail their genome really is. That we need to preserve what is left by stopping the destructive things we do. 

If you read my post on objective morality you may find that interesting.
I have to go to bed now.  I don't stay up later than 3 AM.

http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1298082277

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:31am
Then I will wait for your next response until tomorrow.

What I meant by that statement is purely that if you design something that is meant to be so highly intricate, surely you would design it to a level that would ensure it does not degrade, or in this instance, de-evolve.

You say random mutations do not exist, what if we take out the "random" ?

Bear with me I am going somewhere with this:

A child always inherits from its parents, True?

Does a child always inherit from just ONE of its parents? No?

Then surely the combination of different aspects of each parent culminate to produce the child?
(Yes I know this is all basic stuff at the moment but why be overcomplicated when simplicity is the key?)

So Parent1 never had letters (as an example) RTY in their DNA, but Parent2 did, but never had QWE.

Then by them coming together, one of the finite possibilities is for their child to contain letters QTE, or RWE or any other combination from them.

This change in their DNA which would differ slightly from either parent and therefore would be unique and with those new attributes.

As their family tree descends their DNA contains more and more variation and therefore different or even new characteristics based on the more diverse information in their DNA.

Does this sound plausible in your view?


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 6th, 2011 at 2:52pm

ProofMan wrote on Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:31am:
Then I will wait for your next response until tomorrow.

What I meant by that statement is purely that if you design something that is meant to be so highly intricate, surely you would design it to a level that would ensure it does not degrade, or in this instance, de-evolve.

You say random mutations do not exist, what if we take out the "random" ?

Bear with me I am going somewhere with this:

A child always inherits from its parents, True?

Does a child always inherit from just ONE of its parents? No?

Then surely the combination of different aspects of each parent culminate to produce the child?
(Yes I know this is all basic stuff at the moment but why be overcomplicated when simplicity is the key?)

So Parent1 never had letters (as an example) RTY in their DNA, but Parent2 did, but never had QWE.

Then by them coming together, one of the finite possibilities is for their child to contain letters QTE, or RWE or any other combination from them.

This change in their DNA which would differ slightly from either parent and therefore would be unique and with those new attributes.

As their family tree descends their DNA contains more and more variation and therefore different or even new characteristics based on the more diverse information in their DNA.

Does this sound plausible in your view?


I like your questions.  It has some "loaded" ideas in it. So I have to be long in my answer.

The idea of designing in the ability of the "creation" to destroy itself is where you get stuck.  It is just the way it is if we don't follow the rules that support life and health.

We are our own worst genomic enemies.  This is because of our ignorance.  Putting us in this world and then letting us believe in all sorts of crap is how the creation is.  Part of the creation is this principle of "delusion".  The delusion also called the "knowledge of good and evil" which means a deeply held belief in good and evil is the original sin.

Opinions and judgments are bad and are based on this level of ignorance caused by this sin of "belief in good and evil".
Humans love to vilify make factions, created differences, and kill one another in the name of good and in the name of evil.

It is a common belief of atheists that this religious God is a screwed up entity that designed a pile of confusion and entropy.  That God is hateful, racist, antagonistic, and basically evil because he hates queers, murderers,liars, thieves, manipulators, the greedy and people who have orphan children with no father nor/and/or no mother. This is a common belief.

It is well known from genetics that humans are part male and part female all of us.  Some have more male than others some have more female than others.  However, if we want a proper level of instinctual balance energy of the male and female in children (if you want sane, kind, intelligent and loving children, who create kind and loving grandchildren etc.), they need a good mother and a good father to represent those two archetypes (ideally, in perfect balance and in harmony) of the human psyche (soul). 

Without a good kind protective and responsible father, a child is screwed up. With out a nurturing caring, nesting, feeding mother, a child is screwed up. Without either, you have either an "insane" saint who rejects the world or someone who is totally lost and lives in hell with a short life. Someone who can never figure it out, because everywhere they go they seemingly mess up their life.  Blame everyone on all their problems, etc.  ( I like using extremes to make my points, but lately the extremes are all over the place gunning down people in schools and strapping on bombs,etc.)

The nature of the individual on the inside can never be totally understood, because some people who have made it to objective total sanity, came from really evil parents. The evil parents can be or were the catalyst for self realization.

So, it was the idea of good and evil which are both constructions of (fantasy) the human psyche based on fear, emotion, and needs that screw us up.  It is concepts of good and evil that control us.  We all want the good in life, but one person's good is another's evil.  In reality neither exist.

But we were given rules to live by to protect the children and our genome, but we have disregarded most of them.  Until now, the last ten years, we really had no knowledge of the human genome, and no reason to follow rules of conduct out of information. 

We eat bad, we live by technology that weakens us, we radiate our bodies constantly, we only seem to want money and power, because we are weak and stupid. We moved away from the perfect environment and foods and from following rules that protect society and make it strong.

Do you think that cultivating new strains of bacteria that eat human flesh is a good thing?  When you inject semen in a highly populated bacteria colony, it learns to eat semen.  Duh?  When you feed bacteria nylon it learns to eat that as well.  I prefer the nylon eating type to the type that likes to  eat human flesh.

When you teach bacteria to eat anything it will do it.  It rapidly adapts to the food you feed it.

The downfall of human is ignorance, compulsions and being like animals.   If we ever want to get beyond being compulsive driven animals who live in constant fear, we need to move in the opposite direction.

The idea of being tolerant of things that are destroying our species out of compassion for the afflicted with this "natural" condition is a social sickness clear as can be.  We now encourage life and total species annihilation by this form of "good" and tolerance.  If we don't  tolerate people with guns, bombs, race hate, then why do we tolerate the species killers amongst us. 

A good breeding ground for new strains of weapons of mass destruction to the human species is in sexual contacts that are not safe at all, that cause new breeds of bacteria, virus, and fungus. 

The vagina is cleaner than the mouth.  It has natural disinfectants to keep it clean.  It is not normally a breeding ground for new strains of virus nor bacteria.  But when it is used improperly, abused during the reproductive years,  it gives rise to all sorts of weapons of mass destruction. 

If you want to make all sorts of new virus that are a major cause of mutations in the womb and in the gene level of the DNA, then don't follow rules of hygiene.  Rules of conduct that protect our species.

Developing new drugs to fight off virus and bacteria simply make new virus and bacteria continue to develop. Stopping the process that makes new microorganisms that kill us and destroy our genome is a better idea.

Pretty soon we will have pandemics, and many forms of bacteria that eat humans that cannot be stopped with any antibiotics nor any form of immunization.  We see that now with AIDs and people who die in hospitals with flesh eating bacteria that does not respond to antibiotics. So, we make new drugs, and those drugs also contribute to the genetic degradation.   

When you realize that the rules of conduct, and what we were supposed to do to preserve our genome have been disregarded and we have worked around this with some medications,  and now we are causing cancer because of this utter ignorance and inability to follow the instructions from the designer(s). These instructions are in every culture and they never had any clue about micro biology or the way the human genome is made, at the time these rules were handed out. Some of these rules are over 6,000 years old.
How does that song go.  "Where have all the flowers gone, long time passing." 

Science and medicines are money makers, and they will do all that is necessary to make money and preserve their lifestyle. And besides disease is good business.  More disease, means more suffering.  More suffering is insurance of more money for the big businesses.

Humans are pretty self destructive by nature.   We have to fight against our nature and are desire to accept and nurture that which is destroying us. We relish self destruction. 

If we gave our genomes half a chance they have enough information to heal themselves. It may take 10 generations to get some healing.  There are redundancies we have not even begun to tap into. 

We just prefer to live and let others kill off our genomes and make our descendants suffer with disease short lives and no brains with no way back.

Just look at the Chimps, Gorilla, Orangutans, and the Macaque monkeys, all come from the same genetic lineage as us.  Look what happened to them from ignorance, compulsions and no direction on how to live safe.

They had no prophets, no direction and were left all alone in tribes with little or no connection to any knowledge. I think they are here as examples for us to wake up from.

Now as far as mutations that are natural, they are not mutations.  They are genetic information passed from the parents to the offspring.

This idea of magical random mutations taking place between generations is just that magical card being pulled out of the asses of "scientists" who have no balls to go and see where they came from, because it would stop their grants if they broke ranks and did a study to see that they are repeat DNA patterns from many generations back.

The only place where real mutations can take place is in the womb by drugs, radiation or any toxins that harm the fetus.
These are what you call random, but are really just caused by bad living and not following the rules to protect the children.

When you analyze all the rules of conduct, it is only about preserving the genome and protecting the children.  Nothing more. 

I think that we also have the ability to fix this, when the knowledge is "handed" to us.

It is the nature of the human to remain as human to be in delusion.  To have the world envelope you and own your consciousness. If you are tired of being a pawn of other ignorant people's religious ideologies, then get free of them.

Yogis teach "Jnanham Bandaha" which means worldly knowledge is bondage.

Knowledge of the real God is liberation.  The real God = Truth and that is what a seeker only wants.  The truth is inherent in every person once they realize how screwed up any other "seeking" is.  If you are not seeking the truth then you are only seeking to perpetuate your's and other people's human emotional mental garbage. 

The true purpose of life is to get free of this delusion, by removing one delusion at a time. Or if you are ambitious, remove many at a time.  But that is very painful.

There is only genetic information passed from generation to the next, and there is disease caused by toxins.

Mutations are nearly ALWAYS bad.

Mutations in microorganisms will kill us off and destroy our DNA cell replication as they attack our DNA and enter into our already defective genomes. 

There has been only ONE Mutation in the human species that has shown any evidence of trying to help us overcome bad living. It is a mutation noted in the orient of a gene that helps to process bad hydrogenated oils that cause severe clogged arteries and heart disease.  They really don't know where it came from? 

When they have no clue where a DNA pattern comes from, they say it is a random mutation and it is good. If only one in 70 is good, then we are destroying our genome by "natural selection".

They, scientists, want to be the messengers of hope for mankind (represent the god of science), the saviors of mankind, (that there are "magical mutations" fixing our genomes)  but the truth is the opposite.  They are contributing to the problem "innocently" out of ignorance.

Ignorance of the rules of how humans are made is not an excuse.  Belief in magical processes and mystical causes has always been destructive to humans. It is no different now with this belief in "magical evolutionary mutations" that cause us to get better.

I love your questions.  I hope you are sincere.





Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 6th, 2011 at 6:10pm

wrote on Nov 19th, 2009 at 11:10pm:

Quote:
Heredity has noting to do with the theory of evolution because all I have seen is a horse becomes a horse, a dog is always a dog, a lizard becomes another lizard,  a fish is always a fish, a human is always a human.  If it turns into something else then it would "evolve".  If you can't show any changes into a new genus or even an extremely modified version of the same creature then you could show evolution.  However, there is no evidence for this.  A tiny horse becoming a large horse is still a horse.  In actual fact the tiny horse was much more complex and from the bone structure was able to walk on different types of terrain. It had multiple bones in the legs, whereas the newer horse has one set of bones going down in a single line of joints.  That is de-evolution.

It's called descent with modification. Your personal lack of observation is meaningless in this matter. And so is your lack of imagination. It is simple and logical to understand that lots of little changes amount to a big change. Lots of little steps will take you 1000 miles. This is elementary.

[quote]There is no such thing as net positive mutation in the DNA.  It is not "mutation" if it is just the expression of the DNA passed to the offspring.  And any changes in the DNA have never shown any form of evolution, only degradation and de-evolution.  I have read many more papers on this than you have obviously because all you get is creatures adapting to survive as the same creatures and de-evolution from screwed up changes to the DNA coding. There is no other evidence in the DNA.

Lie.


Quote:
It is not mutation if it is just the expression of the DNA passed to the offspring.

So a child receiving two copies of the same gene is an "expression"?. HAha.. aww all this laughing is an incredible ab workout.
No. It's a mutation. Mutation is fact. You ever hear of Down's syndrome? Yeah, that's a mutation. Two parents without that problem can produce offspring with EXTRA DNA. This is a mutation. It did not exist in either parent. This is an irrefutable fact.


Quote:
Competition does not equate to evolution.

Of course it doesn't. Mutations produce the new genes. Competition provides a filter. Good mutations become more frequent in the population. You've admitted this occurs. We've documented it in moths and birds. It's a fact. Given more time this process produces all of the variety we see today.

None of those quotes support your position or your mindset. None of them are advocating being woefully ignorant or ignoring a mass of scientific achievement that is better supported than anything else humanity has ever produced.

Seriously. Your objections to Heredity, Mutation and Competition are completely ridiculous. Do you have ANY serious or insightful concerns about those topics?

[/quote]

Mutations can only produce a net reduction in fitness.  It is amazing how you religious Evodelusionists deny the facts.
from your  degreed and accredited PHD's of evolution 70% of these mutatoins are BAD, deleterious, have negative impact on the creatures,  ONE PERCENT! and only 1% is considered to be "maybe" (exact quote) positive.
http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1300062189/4#4

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 7th, 2011 at 11:26am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT5MbyKVbDs

Can you believe how stupid these people are to produce these fantasy videos and pronounce with such "assuredness" as if it was fact.  It is videos like that that piss me off because little children are brainwashed with crap like this.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 7th, 2011 at 12:03pm
"You claim De-Evolution happens, if created by a god why would this be a part of a creatures design? Pretty bad designer in my eyes."


Many of the Evotards evaluate God's design this way.  "Well that laryngeal nerve is a bad design."

(This is a ridiculous form of Evodelusionism "morality".  Evodelusionism has all the "ear marks" of relgion, including its ridiculous "morality".  Part of that is that "God f**ked up the world, can't you see that? That is why there is no god." WELL??Which is it? Did HE screw it up or did we? HUMM?)

I don't think the laryngeal nerve represents the original design condition nor intent. And even so the speed of electric pulses in a nerve are in microseconds even at 50 yards long, so it is not a concern and doesn't stop life. It fully functions and the creature being able to live pretty well is evidence of that.

The original design has been "DE-EVOLVED" into a condition of less fitness and less ideal as with all creatures that are set free on this planet.  THAT IS THE DESIGN. Duh!

If you realize that all of the extinct creatures have met up with a "DE-Evolved from the original design" flaw that would not allow them to live.

That is a funny statement. ;D   I don't make up the evidence.  I just point it out.  There is no way for you to understand what is good or bad except by your extremely limited beliefs and your prejudices based on your humanness, fears, limitations etc.

There is no good or bad in absolute reality.  It is part of the human mind and nothing else.  I don't see dogs describing good or bad. I don't see any other creature who has this idea.
Good or Bad is relativity in action. It is the foundation of it.

What is good is relative to what a human "wants" to represent good.  The Islamic Terroists, find that killing off 3000 Americans to be "really good". 

In yoga we realize that Good and Bad are two poles of the same delusion.  Yogis are asked to focus on one pole only (good) and allow the other to die in your mind and soul. Then "good" will also vanish, because it "requires" bad to exist. Then all that is left is perfection and perfect objective awareness.
The "original sin" is this idea of good and bad. 



I see that survival seems to be the main driving force in creatures. Where did that come from?

I see amazing intricate and extremely complex structures in creatures that could never have been produced by what we know now. We know that mutations are 70 to 1 deleterious.

There is no way for evolution to exist with those odds.
Anytime you take an existing functional protean and mess with it you make it weaker or nonfunctional or cause death.

The idea of "random mutations" is like crashing your car, and then some magical mutation fairy comes along and fixes the smashed in parts with no help from any repair people.

The only thing that is going to save us is the designer. PERIOD. So get used to that.

The designer is so far beyond human comprehension that it is funny to see all the forms people have projected in order to approach this thing they call God.

God is not comprehended by the human mind.

We attempt with our feeble mind to make up ideas but they are never really what God is.

We attempt to judge the world of design with our feeble minds.   
"That is a poor design". 

That is how it is....period.  Accept it, so you can deal with it and try to educate humanity on how frail their genome really is. That we need to preserve what is left by stopping the destructive things we do. 

If you read all my post on objective morality you may find that interesting.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 19th, 2011 at 2:29am

wrote on Nov 20th, 2009 at 10:38am:

Quote:
There is no evidence that even suggest evolution in all the 20,000 papers I have read on this.

Riiiight. The world is flat! the world is flat!

[quote]There is no Mutation in DNA, only replication of gene expression and adaption.

Mutation IN DNA? That doesn't even make sense. What the hell are you talking about. DNA mutates. It changes. It's a string of nucleotides that physically changes. Stop saying this. It's a lie. You repeat this over and over.
"only replication of gene expression and adaption" -- WHAT?!?! This makes no sense. Replication OF expression? Do you know what gene expression is? It's a process. It's not an object, it can't be "replicated". What are you talking about?
And adaptation is a product of Heredity, Mutation, and Competition.

Don't just type pages and pages of your rhetoric. We've seriously gone nowhere.
Get specific.

Do you have any SPECIFIC objections that aren't based on your personal lack of observation or your personal unwillingness to believe lots of small changes equal big change. [/quote]

Here are a few of the quotes from some of the religious Evodelusionists.

"Do you have any SPECIFIC objections that aren't based on your personal lack of observation or your personal unwillingness to believe lots of small changes equal big change."

Answer:  I am unwilling to believe in any human emotional mental garbage based on faith and some emotionally driven need to conform and believe in religious slogans.

I know that change takes place, but there is only evidence of genetic degradation in all complex creatures.  So, your faith and belief is based on what? The evidence only shows genetic losses and genetic degradation.

The straw man argument is taken out of context.

There are NO mutations in the biological process of reproduction. 

I have asked hundreds of geneticists to allow us to perform an experiment and scramble about 100 or so of their DNA base pairs to see how long they would live.
These fools think that normal reproduction produces "mutations".  What is wrong with these people?  Mutations are caused by the items listed below.

So far not one has been up for this experiment of DNA scrambling. Because mutations are destructivbe to the human genome and are only destructive.

And, the differences between parents and offspring are not mutations, but are replications of existing DNA coding that meshes and mixes perfectly as all perfect DNA coding that is functional.

Keep in mind that in the human genome project they have found over 4600 know DNA mutations that cause genetic diseases and each day they find more. 

The odds of you having a genetic disease is 100%. There are no exceptions today.

There is only genetic degradation shown in all DNA studies.  Mutations are not good things, yet the Evotards, Geneticists, biologist, and all the pseudo science involving biology are believing that they are good.   Why?

It is a popular myth to want to believe that humans are "evolving" getting "smarter" and crap like that. But the evidence is only showing genetic loss and that includes intelligence.

Does evolution have an appeal?  You bet! Is it real? Absolutely not!

We are degrading faster than ever, with new diseases found almost daily from our genetic degradation by not following the rules of genetic preservation.

The rules of genetic preservation are as follows:

1/ Do not promote ways for bacteria to mutate.  Bacteria is a primary mutagen. It is particularly bad when bacteria is present in the process of conception.

2/Do not promote the mutations of virus, by promoting hosts that give rise to these virus mutations. Virus mutations are the cause of many of our defects in the human genome.

3/ Avoid all forms of electromagnetic radiation from birth throughout your entire reproductive ages.  This is a powerful mutagen that destroys life.

4/Avoid all forms of chemicals that attack (including toxic chemicals and biological warfare) the human cells and cause mutations. Avoid all forms of toxic minerals in drinking water (chlorine) or foods and radioactive minerals.

5/ Avoid medical treatments using radiation during your reproductive ages, especially in the areas of the body where human eggs are stored, and were sperm is made.  One infusion of radiation on a human egg, can destroy an egg and make it not viable or give birth defects, miscarriages, and mutations that may survive and be passed on by your offspring, furthering the genetic degradation.

6/Avoid lifestyles of laziness that cause atrophy of healthy genetics, atavisms, and weakening of genes producing body parts, such as muscles, heart, lung tissue is weakened by not keeping it working. What we don't use we lose. This is shown in DNA evidence.  Smaller jaw, weaker bones, weaker organs etc.

7/ Avoid anal sex with vaginal penetration at the ages of reproduction. This is a "good" avenue of mutations and miscarriages. Bacteria attacking the embryo at the time of conception is horrible on the  human genome.

8/ Avoid all anal sex without absolute protections against the contact of sperm with bacteria in feces. Bacteria was designed to eat whatever it is presented with. When you present it with sperm, then you are "teaching" it to eat the most foundational part of the human reproduction and to lean to eat humans.

Here is a video that explains the results of mutagens in the reproductive process.  These are not accidents but are done by deliberate acts out of ignorance.
There is only cause an result in real science.
Magical thinking is that humans are not causing their own extinction.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abcsZZ9Duxw





Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Nov 25th, 2011 at 6:42am
Good afternoon.

Sorry for such a long absence but a lot has been happening.

GoodScience, yould you agree to me starting a thread to ask some very simple one-line questions and you providing some very simple one-line (where possible of course) answers in order to stop some of the repetition that has occurred?

I feel this will eliminate a lot of wasted time and keep things more focused.

I look forward to a more direct expression of peoples opinions and a clearer understanding by all.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Nov 28th, 2011 at 5:27am

ProofMan wrote on Nov 25th, 2011 at 6:42am:
Good afternoon.

Sorry for such a long absence but a lot has been happening.

GoodScience, yould you agree to me starting a thread to ask some very simple one-line questions and you providing some very simple one-line (where possible of course) answers in order to stop some of the repetition that has occurred?

I feel this will eliminate a lot of wasted time and keep things more focused.

I look forward to a more direct expression of peoples opinions and a clearer understanding by all.



We are talking about science, and when science is mixed in with religious ideas, you have to encircle the religious ideas with pure logic and reason to illuminate them.

Also on this forum I set this forum up so that one post can have 25,000 characters so that people  could expand on what they are discussing.

What questions do you have on evolution?


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Nov 30th, 2011 at 6:21am
It wasnt so much about evolution itself.

I have found that many people are visiting and asking you the same questions time and time again about yourself or the theories you present and the answers dont quite seem to be what they were looking for.

So, if you would agree to participate, I was going to simplify these questions and make them as basic as possible (why overcomplicate the simple?) and have them in a thread that you could refer people to.

I think it would stop a lot of arguments and get everyone on the same level.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 1st, 2011 at 3:49am

ProofMan wrote on Nov 30th, 2011 at 6:21am:
It wasnt so much about evolution itself.

I have found that many people are visiting and asking you the same questions time and time again about yourself or the theories you present and the answers dont quite seem to be what they were looking for.

So, if you would agree to participate, I was going to simplify these questions and make them as basic as possible (why overcomplicate the simple?) and have them in a thread that you could refer people to.

I think it would stop a lot of arguments and get everyone on the same level.



What is wrong with arguments?  Is that concise enough of a question for you?

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Dec 5th, 2011 at 11:37am
The problem with arguments is that they are the same arguments repeatedly meaning no progress is being made by anyone. If we can avoid the unintelligible arguments and return to true discussion (of which I have not seen much of just childishness) then precious time would not be wasted with repetition and name calling.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 6th, 2011 at 1:50am

ProofMan wrote on Dec 5th, 2011 at 11:37am:
The problem with arguments is that they are the same arguments repeatedly meaning no progress is being made by anyone. If we can avoid the unintelligible arguments and return to true discussion (of which I have not seen much of just childishness) then precious time would not be wasted with repetition and name calling.


Evodelusionism is a religion of morons. 
Unless you are a moron, then that is not an insult. It is a statement of facts from the absolutely irrefutable scientific evidence.

Humans are heading towards extinction.

We now have 1 in 7 women with breast cancer. 1 in 12 humans have diabetes cause by ONLY genetic reasons. You and all your relatives are sick from thousands of  genetic diseases, yet you think there is evolution that is making us better?

The evidence is in your own being, your children, parents, brothers and sisters and all of humanity, yet you deny it. 

Do you actually think that it is normal to live with genetic sickness?  Who told you that is good? Who told you that is "normal"? Why do you believe them? Go read the story of the Buddha.  When he saw all the sickness, old age and death, he immediately knew humans were screwed up.


The medical industry is huge. If you want to make good money, get a job in the medical industry. Pharmaceuticals are huge, yet they have no cures.  This is because people are afraid of death. Death is not a normal thing in the heart of humans. You think about that.

Don't just believe what you were taught that death is a normal thing.  We brought this on ourselves.  We pay for the mistakes of our ancestors.

There is no cure when the core of your body, the DNA is screwed up from extremely stupid human behavior that promotes the genetic degradation.

We are so deep in this delusional condition that we don't have any way to accept what has happened to us.  So, we make up delusional religions to hide from the Truth.

We continue to divide up the earth more and more with imaginary boundaries, and make enemies of our fellow mankind.  And you think there is evolution?

They do this because they are degraded and stupid.  Most humans are really stupid to me, and if they think we are getting better by some magical mutations, they are insane.

The obvious is all around you. It is in your body, your children, your parents in all the sickness and diseases we have, yet you have faith in the mutation fairy?

There is no evolution.  We are heading towards extinction unless we wake up and stop destroying both ourselves and the planet.

The Chimpanzee is a message of genetic degradation.  It came from the same exact genetic superior species as modern humans. This is pretty clear and self evident in the science of DNA, Chromosomes, ERV's and all that tie us to Chimps.

Chimps are nearly extinct from genetic degradation. They cannot think rationally much at all. They have short miserable lives totally on the survival level with no comforts. And they have all the same genetic sicknesses we have, only much sooner onset. They developed the HIV virus for us because their bodies were degenerated sooner and allowed this infection.
After our bodies have degenerated to the same point, now we have it.

This is obvious.

Now!! There is a message for you from the Chimps.


There is no science called "Evolution".  It is a religion that has taken over with stupid humans to avoid the obvious fact that we are destroying ourselves and we don't want to look at it.  Denial of our stupidity is the number one form of denial.

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." Albert Einstein



We want to think that science can figure this out, but look at the evidence. We continue to do the very things that are destroying humanity from the inside of our bodies.

We are more primitive in thoughts of tribal thinking, and rituals of sex and compulsions.
This is the sign of animal behavior.  Animal behavior leads to new virus/bacteria and mutations that are caused from microorganisms.  It is well know that many types of cancer have origins in virus.

Humans had a chance to remain close to the Truth, but they gave it up for HEMG compulsions and fear.

There is no argument. The evidence is in the DNA.  Humans are extremely degraded.

There are only 25,000 coding genes in the human genome and in the population 5000 genetic defects are in them. These mutations are  destroying humanity from the inside.

We know they are diseases, because we still have samples of the good genes. But we do not have the samples of our superior genes any longer that are already destroyed from genetic degradation.

We came from a far superior human species, that was fit, able to adapt to multiple environments and to survive the elements better than any other creature. Yet look how weak and frail we are now.

Even our "great athletes" are dying of genetic diseases.  Go look!

Humans are so stupid they call the most ridiculous ideologies "science" and have been doing that for thousands of years, since we fell into this stupor from genetic degradation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emPINOUlfnE

The question you need to ask yourself is this:

Why do I or anybody follow the mass of humans who are self destructive in their very nature?

Only a very few get free from this crap.  Are you one of them?

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 6th, 2011 at 4:31am

ProofMan wrote on Dec 5th, 2011 at 11:37am:
The problem with arguments is that they are the same arguments repeatedly meaning no progress is being made by anyone. If we can avoid the unintelligible arguments and return to true discussion (of which I have not seen much of just childishness) then precious time would not be wasted with repetition and name calling.


If you want to learn how this has been imposed on your mind, I can help you to unscrew your mind from this cultural nonsense religion.

All of my lessons are about helping you to get free from all human faith based ideologies that have no basis in reality.

If you are here to perpetuate your own dumb ass beliefs based on your indoctrination, then you will not get far.


I am the myth buster of science.

The first myth they teach you is that "God has something to do with religion."  Why do you believe that?  Where is God in these religions? A true religion is not about faith and belief, but about absolute evidence, facts and reality.

My God = Truth and has nothing in common with most religions.

If you are not seeking the Truth, then you are ONLY seeking to perpetuate indoctrination into some mythological ideology or a bunch of human nonsense.

A True religion is about the Truth.  It is not about imaginary gods or imaginary evolution fairies.

A true religion would not separate humans from one another. The truth will make you free and will make you have compassion for others.  When you realize the nature of how sick from degradation,  humans really are in all ways, you will stop believing in them.


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 9th, 2011 at 2:50pm
There is no evidence for any form of advancement from simple to complex. This is not shown in any DNA study.
If you go look on the pubmed.com site alone (where doctors all over the world share DNA studies)  there are over 90,000 articles on "gene loss" alone.

Mitochondrial DNA has lost most of its genes.

The Chimpanzee is our closest relative (I have no doubts on this from the DNA studies) and the data shows absolutely that the Chimp has lost, through mutations in the HAR area alone so many losses that cause the brain, skull to be depressed and to have lost speech and many of the traits that at one time made it human.

In all studies of DNA of any complex, multi-cellular creature in which we have the cousins, or the ancestor group as living we can see the speciation caused gene loss. The newest creatures lost abilities for adaptation that will never be regained.

As far as genetic diseases go in humans, the list is huge and clearly shows our genetic degradation.

1 in 7 women have breast cancer, caused by genetic defects.
1 in 12 humans in the USA have diabetes, caused by genetics AND lifestyle that triggers the onset.  There are millions of people who eat bad foods high in sugar, don't exercise and never get diabetes, because they do not have the genetics.
1 in 15 get heart disease.  There are over 1200 rare genetic diseases that work out to 1 in 10 human having them.
Over 50% of adults in the USA are now using or have been using prescription drugs for mental illness.  Every human on earth is genetically degraded and all have some form of genetic disease.

The human genome shows only genetic loss from a condition of far more fit.
Evolution only shows genetic losses from mutations. 
The study of mutations, alone, destroys any possible way for any net positive mutations to fix any genetic defects.
Mutations are caused by mutagens.  When an existing fully operating gene is messed with "accidentally", it 99.9% of the time reduces the gene functions and creates a new unhealthy DNA/ RNA replication of a malfunctioning gene. The proteins are just not correct for healthy cell replication.
There are WAY over 4600 genetic defects in humans as the cause of genetic diseases. I have asked hundreds of geneticists, biologists to show any form of positive mutations in humans. They can only come up with 4 and are not sure about 3 of them. That is 4600 to 4 or 1150 to 1 against any form of evolution.

This idea that you can drive your car into a tree, and then drive it into another tree to fix is the foundation of the religious magical ideas of evolution.  Any accident to DNA is deleterious. There are only logical causes in the universe.
You can go to any page of any study on all the types of mutations possible, and realize quickly there is no way for any net positive evolution. Go study the types of mutations.

In 1948 the first year that cancer statistics was recorded, the daily death/per population rate for cancer was 80% of what is today. This fact is despite the fact that there were no treatments for cancer other than to cut tumors or breasts off. With the billions of dollars spent on curing cancer every year it is still winning out, because we have increased in genetic defects much more rapidly by out "modern" lifestyle full of mutagens.

Anything that can cause cancer can also simply weaken the human genome.   


Your family is sick from genetic diseases.  Your friends are all dying of some genetic disease, and you think we are getting better? It is a nice myth, but the evidence is absolute on this.

Many Cancer patients will understand completely what it is that I have found in DNA.

For over 150 years this idea that simple life has evolved has been believed.  Scientists also believed that the earth was flat, and anyone who believed in anything else was considered to be uneducated.

This idea of magical occurrences that have no cause is the foundation of evolution.  It is not science, but is an ideology.

In real science there is only cause and result. There is no science without it.  All scientific phenomenons have causes. There are no magical causes.

Yet people believe that energy can assemble itself into complex structures by magical processes that have never been seen.  The foundation of all life is seen in the modern studies of particle physics. It is energy.  E=MC^2  Mass is made of energy and that energy is expelled when it is broken apart.

So, before DNA was actually deeply studied in the last 20 years and the human genome project was developed to map the genetics of humans we did not have this evidence.   This the “tool” that is missing from science to show what is really going on.  Just like the telescope was the tool that put away the earth is flat from science.

People just assumed that evolution was real and projected their faith and belief in this idea onto the meager "evidence" we had. They use all sorts of inferences, implications and projections of faith on the meager evidence we had.  Now, this projection of faith can no longer be done. It will no longer be done within the next 20 or 30 years. Hundred years max, if we survive that long.

It took over 100 years to remove "the earth is flat" from science until all the believers were dead and no longer published their “scientific papers” in the late 1890's.

There is nothing weird about the truth shown in absolute evidence.

Chimpanzees are our nearest cousin and they have all the same diseases we have, but much younger in age.  They were the first of our "relatives" to developed HIV type of virus that has been transferred to us. They live only 30 years in the wild, and are nearly extinct. 
The end result of "evolution" is extinction as evidenced by all the extinct creatures we have found.
Chimps are the message of DNA, telling us where we are heading if we don't stop the, modern mutagens that are causing our eventual extinction.
Humans are genetically degrading much more rapidly than ever. This is obvious and not up for debate.  It is clear in the DNA and basically destroys the possibility for magical, non causal reasons for human existence.

In DNA there is only, gene loss ( completely lost genes), atavism (some of them "might" be able to be triggered), atrophied genes (old genes that don't work any longer, like the vitamin C gene) and the last of the types of gene changes are those that create weakness and reduced fitness for survival. It is the last type that is the foundation of genetic diseases.

If a mutation does not kill it will propagate into the species.

For instance the Chimp has retained extreme muscle strength. Their muscle tissue is way stronger, over twice as strong as any living human.   Their spine and hips are weakened to the point of not being able to walk upright for any length of time. Their brain has reduced in size and in function. 
Humans retain more mental abilities, but are, now retarded compared to ancient humans.  The brain is smaller compared to ancient skulls we have found that were nearly 1500 CC's in volume compared to modern humans of average 1335 CC.s in volume. This is in fact and the older species of humans was shorter in overall height.

This evidence is everywhere that concurs with the absolutely clear physical evidence shown in modern DNA studies.

The oldest version of the dog, the wolf, is far better fit for survival.  The oldest of the Cat , the Saber Toothed Tiger was far more fit.  All have degraded as the species continues. The ancient Rats were huge, over 1000 lbs and grazed the plains.

Bacteria are the "savior" of evolution in DNA studies. It has the ability to adapt to any, digestible, carbon based food.  However, it has never evolved. It has never gained in cells with new functions as required by the faith of evolution believers.  It is not multi cellular and so, does not have “cells to lose”.

There is no "evolution". There is only de-evolution.

I have studied this for over 43 years and seen all the iterations of this religious idea in science.

Ask your friends dying of cancer if they think they evolved, or “improved” into sickness, or do they now understand that they have a genetic degradation into sickness. 

The evidence in everywhere and it is in you, your family, your children, your parents, all suffering and dying from genetic weaknesses.
It is in most dog breeds, which have all sorts of genetic weaknesses.
Cats too.  Elephants also show this, and have become smaller and have less strength than their ancestors.

We have the closest ancestor cousin of the Chicken living in the wild. It is far better fit for survival. 
All you have to do is remove the belief in "evolution" and just look at the evidence.


I wish you all well, and that we learn to stop the mutagens that are destroying us from the inside.


"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education."
Albert Einstein

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Dec 13th, 2011 at 11:06am
Im sorry but after trying to get down to simplicities and eliminate your delusional view of this world from the arguments it is more than obvious that you dont have the understanding of basic scientific principles to prove anything one way or another.

You also claim that gravity.works on all things at all scales which is.completely incorrect and we have demonstrated this many many times in easily repeatable experiments. If the gravitational pull between two atomically small objects did not differ from their larger counterparts we wouldnt have to have searched for the higgs boson which supplies tue missing mass of objects.

You preach that you have read so many scientific papers but your understanding of the scientific world seems very unevolved your thoughts on the words theories and facts are pre-high school in origin.

You also claim that you have witnessed these words change to fit with scientists agendas but I have books well over double and triple your (including english dictionaries) that state these words as they are seen today.

You need to go back and be schooled in science and etiquette.
Once you have done this maybe you will have intelligence enough to  debate with some of the great minds on here that are more intellectual than yours.

Your claims of your life are delusional. If your life is as you say then I think you either have a severe mental disorder or you received a hefty blow.to the head.

Good day

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 13th, 2011 at 2:19pm

ProofMan wrote on Dec 13th, 2011 at 11:06am:
Im sorry but after trying to get down to simplicities and eliminate your delusional view of this world from the arguments it is more than obvious that you dont have the understanding of basic scientific principles to prove anything one way or another.

You also claim that gravity.works on all things at all scales which is.completely incorrect and we have demonstrated this many many times in easily repeatable experiments. If the gravitational pull between two atomically small objects did not differ from their larger counterparts we wouldnt have to have searched for the higgs boson which supplies tue missing mass of objects.

You preach that you have read so many scientific papers but your understanding of the scientific world seems very unevolved your thoughts on the words theories and facts are pre-high school in origin.

You also claim that you have witnessed these words change to fit with scientists agendas but I have books well over double and triple your (including english dictionaries) that state these words as they are seen today.

You need to go back and be schooled in science and etiquette.
Once you have done this maybe you will have intelligence enough to  debate with some of the great minds on here that are more intellectual than yours.

Your claims of your life are delusional. If your life is as you say then I think you either have a severe mental disorder or you received a hefty blow.to the head.

Good day


Your post is very emotional.  It means that I have shown you the truth about your egotistical belief in your religion. They have you by the ego balls with this. They own you, and you are a slave of human emotional mental garbage beliefs.

There are 4600 genetic defects min found in the human genome. There are exactly 4 believed positive mutations.
That is 1150 to 1 against any form of evolution.

1 in 7 women have breast cancer. (source Amercican Cancer Society) 33% of humans from 15 to 64 years old die of cancer. (source CDC)

1 in 12 have diabetes (source diabetes.org)

1 in 10 have "rare" diseases (source NORD)
There are thousands of genetic diseases and we are finding new ones each generation.

You have genetic diseases.  Your family, parents, siblings. aunts uncles, cousins, grandparents all have genetic diseases. Their life is regulated by the medical industry. See how long you/they live without medical help?

You believe in fairy tales.

DNA has not been around but for the last 10 years in this form of absolute evidence, that cannot be refuted, but believers will refute anything because of ego, faith and belief that they think this crap is science.

I wish you well.  Your religion is worthless crap.  I don't have any delusions.  I was tested and have no mental illness and extreme IQ.  I got this way because my ancestors did not destroy their mental abilities with mutations caused by unhealthy life styles and I never believe anyone on anything.



This is because my parents did not allow me to follow nonsense religions. My father taught me not to believe anyone, but to find the truth of the matter in real evidence.

If you had been raised in India you would most likely believe in some Hindu god.
If you had been born in Africa, the Witch doctor would be your hero.
Where you were born the TV, the peers, the schools all preach this religious nonsense.

In the mean time humans are heading for extinction faster than ever with modern mutagens.

Why are you so blind to the Truth?

I do not make any conclusions until I have the absolute evidence on the matter.
For 150 years they have had fossils that are meaningless, conversation pieces with stories made about them.

We see that creatures have similarity and that it is obvious that some have degenerated from others.   But without DNA fossils are worthless.

DNA is 100% accurate and only shows genetic loss in all complex creatures.

If you really want to learn science, I am your best bet.
If you  want to be a closed minded fool who follows human emotional mental garbage, then so be it.

I wish you well.

If you don't know that gravity works exactly the same under exactly the same parameters, then you are really lost.

In order to elevate your disgusting religion to a "theory". they had to degrade a scientific law of gravity.  How screwed up and stupid is your religion?

The real axioms of science. 1/ Never believe anyone on anything. Find your own truth. 2/ Never form beliefs. Beliefs destroy your credibility and ruin science. 3/ Only go with absolute knowledge that cannot be refuted as your evidence. 4/ Don't join any human associations who control your mind for money, fear of loss, or any human weakness, like needing prestige, college degrees etc. 5/ Remember the scientific LAW of cause and result. If that is avoided then it is religion.

Your religion violates most of the criteria for a science.  Evolution in particular violates the law of cause and effect, the very foundation of science.

I am here to help you get free if your goal is to be a free thinker. If you  goal is to conform to other people's nonsense, you already have that taken care of .


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by ProofMan on Dec 15th, 2011 at 4:42am
I was not raised by a television nor indoctrinated by anything. You use the same lines to categorise anyone that can prove you wrong.

I was raised reading the Edda and in my life became fascinated by the inner workings of everything.

I am now a leading scientist in europe and see all what I said with my own eyes.

You sir are a fool, most likely homeschooled or brought up in a community where real false religion (christianity) is everywhere even in the schools.

You contradict yourself constantly. I believe nothing of what you say as it is all unproven and you constantly refuse.to give evidence or even proof of what you claim in anything (not just evolution).

You are nothing but preacher. You are no scientist as you do not acknowledge or abide by scientific principle or practice.

You preach a religion you have been indoctrinated in towhether you wish to acknowledge it or not.

None of this is said with any hatred or emotion but stating facts based on what has been observed here.

I am now to return to my work and so will spend no more time arguing with the self-righteous preaching fool who runs this forum.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 17th, 2011 at 2:54pm
You are closed minded because of your position and your ego is fully in control of your life.

Status, prestige, money, all are the trappings used to keep you stupid.  This is the way of the world.

You convinced yourself for emotional reasons that this crap is real. If you want to be free you can. If you want to remain trapped keep doing the same crap, overlooking the obvious and having your head in the sand, so to speak.

Worldly knowledge is bondage.   When you become the observer of life and yourself then you can be free.  As long as you are buried in your faith and belief and surround yourself with followers of your religion, you will continue to be ignorant.

Being a major scientist and not even understanding the law of cause and result that all of science IS, shows you are not a scientist.  You pretend to be one.  You get  paid to pretend to be one.

Again.  Your family is sick, you are sick, your parents are sick, your friends are sick from genetic degradation. The evidence is overwhelming and yet you  manage to "not see".  That is just how extremely controlled you  are by this religion of yours.

There is only genetic degradation shown in all multicellular creatures.

In all speciation events, the creatures lose fitness and become more limited.

The oldest of the genetic lineage of any species was the most fit.

Chimpanzees are degraded from the same exact genetic lineage as we came from. This is shown in DNA, Chromosomes, ERV's, and in the characteristics of Chimpanzees. 

They are a message as to where we are heading with the rapid genetic degradation shown in humans in the last few generations.

Since 1948 the daily rate of deaths from cancer has risen by over 20%. There were no treatments for cancer in 1948 except to cut out tumors.
The reason for this rise in cancer deaths is genetic degradation that is more rapid now than ever.  Modern mutagens are killing us off.

33% of people ages 15 to 64 die of cancer.  Source the CDC in the US.

Cancer is a genetic disease.

1 in 12 in the US have diabetes, caused by genetics and environmental triggers.  Source Diabetes.org
1 in 10 have rare diseases, source NORD.
1 in 7 women have breast cancer, and this is just one type of cancer.  Source cancer.org

While the people you love are all dying and are sick, you are pretending to be a scientist.  What a cosmic joke.  You are helping to destroy them and our future as a species, because you  are so brainwashed and stupid by your "education".

You have no ability to sort out the truth from the nonsense, because it would cost you money or your  prestige if you  broke ranks and were to wake up from you self imposed stupor.







Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 18th, 2011 at 2:47am
You don't need a theory, you need the truth.

When you think you are in the correct ideology becasue you left another ideology behind:

1/ Most people are ruled by other people. They're tribal by nature and want to belong, to groups. So they get into other forms of indoctrination easily, and don't realize that too is an ideology disguised as something other than the ideology you just got free from. As soon as you profess your allegiance to any man made ideology, you make a mistake and get your ego and relationships with others based on that ideology, thinking it was the right thing to do at the time.

2/ It is like the drunk who has to get away from all his drunk buddies in order to stay sober; No difference. If you write a book or profess it in public, then you really mess up your life and now what do you do? Well all too often people realize they screwed up way late, and have money, livelihood and reputation on the line with this ideology so they die supporting delusions or they confess on their death bed. It is far better to stay away from all HEMG imposed on you and seek only truth. 

People who teach crap ideologies to children are the most screwed up, because they now have to admit what they have done to these children in order to get free. That is not likely. They normally die with the delusions fully in control.

3/. So, often the people with the ideology are in positions of authority made by man made icons, religion, philosophy, science, etc as my videos explain. These authorities are often delusional people who are just repeating what was brainwashed into their minds and they do it exactly the same way to you that they were brainwashed. They totally believe they are on the correct side of ethics and are the "good" people in any controversy. That is how screwed up humans can get.

4/ In science this idea of peer review, is really just social pressure to conform to the accepted ideological beleifs of the time. Especially in science that is based on inference, implications, beliefs where the ideology comes first and it is superimposed on anything they see or any evidence. Belief destroys credibility for a scientist: scientific suicide. Unless you have absolutely irrefutable physical evidence that is recognized by all people, you can't make any conclusions.

5/ The word conclusion means that your statements are final on the subject and cannot be refuted by anyone. Conclusion means final. Suppositions are not conclusions. Inferences are not conclusions. In real science we seek only to find the truth in the matter. The truth in the matter requires absolute evidence that cannot be denied by a rational person who is not controlled by ideology. Once you have THAT evidence then every premise, every peice of eivdence only points to that conclusion.


6/ So you test the conclusion by testing against all the evidence we have on the subject. After you test it with at least 1000 pieces of data and they all concur, you are on the right path. After you test every known idea of this science against this conclusion then it is over, that is the law that governs this part of science. It becomes the law and is how real science is done.

7/ When politically driven ideologies rule there is no real truth in them. They are there because the politicians of the time want that for the control they need to stay in power.  It is just how humans operate.  Sad but true.  The institutions are all about politics and the lowest common denominator, money and power. They don't really give a hoot about the truth or anything.  Just money, power, prestige, and feed the ego. 

8/ When you as an individual realize this, you are part way on your path to emotional, mental freedom. It is hard to let go of ideas that you may base part of your life on, but that is what is required to grow into the truth.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 18th, 2011 at 4:41am
The real axioms of science:

1/ Never believe anyone on anything. Find your own truth.

2/ Never form beliefs. Beliefs destroy your credibility and ruin science.

3/ Only go with absolute knowledge that cannot be refuted as your evidence.

4/ Don't join any human associations who control your mind for money, fear of loss, or any human weakness, like needing prestige, college degrees etc.

5/ Remember the scientific LAW of cause and result. If that is avoided then it is religion. (evolution avoids this law and says it doesn't exist.)


Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 18th, 2011 at 2:34pm
The morons now in science are the problem when it comes to understanding what is really going on. 

We have people who are so stupid with PhD's in this religious nonsense that it is hard to think that anyone can be that stupid.

However, the fact that these morons exist and are calling themselves scientist is EVIDENCE of genetic mental degradation.

In academia the lowest intelligence is the driving force. Not the highest. No intelligent person would believe that humans are better or evolving when 100 % have genetic diseases.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 23rd, 2011 at 5:49am
Evodelusionism is a religion because it never happens ever.

It is based on magical ideas projected on the physical world and now that we have all the physical evidence against it we can disregard it.

As long as we did not have the physical evidence of the world being close to a spherical shape, the belief in a flat world was the common belief.  Even after the evidence was presented and it was obvious to those who understood it and allowed themselves to understand it;  it was fought against, even until the late 1890's.

It wasn't until the last 12 years of the Human Genome Project that the evidence became crystal clear against evolution.

Once again:  They have discovered over 4600 gentic defects in humans, causing genetic diseases.  There are ONLY 4 positive mutations that are believed to have happened.  None of them are verifiable,by the way.

These, so called "positive" mutations have never been looked for in the entire species of humanity to see if they existed before.  It is possible that they are remnants barely hanging on by a very tiny thread in a very tiny number of people. 
In time if mutations don't completely take them out, they will try to continue in offspring.

Remember "Evolution" is a stupid religion of people with blinders on their eyes.

People simply are in "love" with the idea that we are getting better, when the reality is exactly the opposite. We are genetically degrading faster than ever.

Since 1948, the first year that cancer deaths were studied in the USA, the statistics for death have risen per day by 20% more people dying (2011) in percentage of those that remain alive on any particular day.

In 1948 there was no treatment for cancer except to cut out tumors and watch people die.

Today with a huge success rate with early detection and several successful treatments, we are still losing the battle to cancer.

Why?

We are more genetically degraded in just three generations. We are rapidly degenerating from mutagens in our environment and from new strains of bacteria, fungus, virus that attack our reproductive cells, even before they are brought together in the fertilization process.

Here are some statistics for you to ponder.

1/  1 in 7 women today have breast cancer. Source American Cancer Society.

2/ 1 in 12 people in the US have diabetes. Diabetes is caused by genetics AND (not or) environmental triggers. Source American Diabetes Association. The math is simple. 320million people in the US and 26 million have diabetes now with millions more added every year.  320/26 = 1 in 12.3 people.

3/ 1 in 10 people have rare diseases (including type 1 diabetes), Source NORD http://www.rarediseases.org/

4/  1 in 15  have genetically caused heart disease.  Source CDC.  Center for Disease Control

5/ "There are over 6,000 genetic disorders that can be passed down through the generations, many of which are fatal or severely debilitating." Source Genetic Disease Foundation.

6/ Autosomal dominant
Familial hypercholesterolemia      1 in 500
Polycystic kidney disease      1 in 1250
Neurofibromatosis Type I      1 in 2,500
Hereditary spherocytosis      1 in 5,000
Marfan syndrome      1 in 4,000 [2]
Huntington's disease      1 in 15,000 [3]
Autosomal recessive
Sickle cell anemia      1 in 625
(African)
Cystic fibrosis      1 in 2,000
(Caucasians)
Lysosomal Acid Lipase (LAL) Deficiency      1 in 40,000
Tay-Sachs disease      1 in 3,000
(American Jews)
Phenylketonuria      1 in 12,000
Mucopolysaccharidoses      1 in 25,000
Glycogen storage diseases      1 in 50,000
Galactosemia      1 in 57,000
X-linked
Duchenne muscular dystrophy      1 in 7,000
Hemophilia      1 in 10,000


5/  The National Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society reports that in the United States today, there are approximately 400,000 people with multiple sclerosis—with 200 more people diagnosed every week. 

6/ Over 50% of adults in the USA are either on drugs or have taken drugs for mental illness.  Mental illness has genetic roots in that the brain function is not correct nor smooth.

I think every person who believes in Evolution is mentally ill, because there is no evidence for it, yet it is believed. You have to be of genetically degraded intelligence to believe in magical human garbage beliefs. But then nearly 100 % of the people on this planet are messed up , genetically.  I have compassion for anyone with a mental defect that allows delusions to be carried as if they were real. 

It has to take a level of suffering to want to believe in magic and a better life on earth, when the evidence is the opposite.  Our only hope is for the Genetic Engineer to come and save us.

Here is a tune for you to listen to.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_songInfo.cfm?bandID=587749&songID=10643745&showPlayer=true&ref=nf








Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Dec 28th, 2011 at 4:02pm
It is not about some half baked theory that others have imposed on you. It is about how to find the truth when you have the absolutely irrefutable evidence available to you.

The absolutely irrefutable physical evidence is always around you.  If you don't have it, then you don't have a science.  The idea of creatures going from simple to complex has no absolute evidence, and the recently discovered absolute evidence has been rejected by the egos in charge of science. They avoid it like the plague, because when you see how clear it is, it destroys their lives, lives based on teaching this nonsense and believing in it as any religious person does.

You don't need a theory, you need the truth.

When you think you are in the correct ideology becasue you left another ideology behind. I wrote this to answer questions on a fellow who dropped on religion because he took on another:

1/ Most people are ruled by other people. They're tribal by nature and want to belong, to groups. So they get into other forms of indoctrination easily, and don't realize that too is an ideology disguised as something other than the ideology you just got free from. As soon as you profess your allegiance to any man made ideology, you make a mistake and get your ego and relationships with others based on that ideology, thinking it was the right thing to do at the time.

(One should never join any group without full understanding of all the absolute evidence they have for their position.)

2/ It is like the drunk who has to get away from all his drunk buddies in order to stay sober; No difference. If you write a book or profess it in public, then you really mess up your life and now what do you do? Well all too often people realize they screwed up way late, and have money, livelihood and reputation on the line with this ideology so they die supporting delusions or the confess on their death bed. It is far better to stay away from all HEMG imposed on you and seek only truth. 

Teachers of earth is flat would never admit they were wrong.  Teachers of evolution will not admit this either and the will group together and form a defense against it. This is exactly what happened with the earth is flat people.

People who teach crap ideologies to children are the most screwed up, because they now have to admit what they have done to these children in order to get free. That is not likely. This is why it is common that they normally die with the delusions fully in control.

3/ So, often the people with the ideology are in positions of authority made by man made icons. religion, phylosophy, science, etc as my videos explain. These authorities are often delusional (It's normal to have delusions) people who are just repeating what was brainwashed into thier minds and they do it exactly the same way to you that they were brainwashed. They totally believe they are on the correct side of ethics and are the "good" people in any controversy. That is how screwed up humans can get.

4/ In science this idea of peer review, is really just social pressure to conform to the accepted ideological beleifs of the time. Especially in science that is based on inference, implications, beliefs where the ideology comes first and it is superimposed on anything they see or any evidence. Belief destroys credibility for a scientist: scientific suicide. Unless you have absolutely irrefutable physical evidence that is recognized by all people, you can't make any conclusions.

5/ The word conclusion means that your statements are final on the subject and cannot be refuted by anyone. Conclusion means final. Suppositions are not conclusions. inferences are not. In real science we seek only to find the truth in the matter. The truth in the matter requires absolute evidence that cannot be denied by a rational person who is not controlled by ideology. Once you have THAT evidence then every premise, every peice of eivdence only points to that conclusion.


6/ So you test the conclusion by testing against all the evidence we have on the subject. After you test it with at least 1000 peices of data and they all concur you are on the right path. After you test every known idea of this science agaist this conclusion then it is over, that is the law that governs this part of science. It becomes the law and is how real science is done.

7/ When politically driven ideologies rule there is no real truth in them. They are there because the politicians of the time want that for the control they need to stay in power.  It is just how humans operate.  Sad but true.  The institutions are all about politics and the lowest common denomenator, money and power. They don't really give a hoot about the truth or anything.  Just money, power, prestige, and feed the ego. 

8/ When you as an individual realize this, you are part way on your path to emotional, mental freedom. It is hard to let go of ideas that you may base part of your life on, but that is what is required to grow into the truth.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Jan 1st, 2012 at 3:30pm
1 of 2 Biochem. J. (2005)
Gene duplication, gene loss and evolution of expression domains in the vertebrate nuclear receptor NR5A (Ftz-F1) family
Ming-Wei KUO*†, John POSTLETHWAIT‡, Wen-Chih LEE*, Show-Wan LOU†, Woon-Khiong CHAN§ and Bon-chu CHUNG*1
*Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 115, †Institute of Fisheries Science, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
2of 2 Road Section 4, Taipei, Taiwan 106, ‡Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A., and §Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 119620

Consequences of Lineage-Specific Gene Loss on Functional Evolution of Surviving Paralogs: ALDH1A and Retinoic Acid Signaling in Vertebrate Genomes
Cristian Cañestro, Julian M. Catchen, Adriana Rodríguez-Marí, Hayato Yokoi, John H. Postlethwait*
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America

Losses Of Long-Established Genes Contribute To Human Evolution
ScienceDaily (Dec. 14, 2007)


Copyright © 2003, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Gene Loss, Protein Sequence Divergence, Gene Dispensability, Expression Level, and Interactivity Are Correlated in Eukaryotic Evolution
Dmitri M. Krylov, Yuri I. Wolf, Igor B. Rogozin, and Eugene V. Koonin1
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA


Evolution only shows genetic losses from mutations.
The study of mutations, alone, destroys any possible way for any net positive mutations to fix any genetic defects.
Mutations are caused by mutagens. When an existing fully operating gene is messed with "accidentally", it 99.6% of the time reduces the gene functions and creates a new unhealthy DNA/ RNA replication of a malfunctioning gene. The proteins are just not correct for healthy cell replication. Source Human Genome Project

Over 10 million people in America have bipolar disorder, and the illness affects men and women equally. This is 1 in 31 people, by the way.

Over 50% of adults in the USA are now using or have been using prescription drugs for mental illness. Every human on earth is genetically degraded and all have some form of genetic disease.
Over 10 million people in America have bipolar disorder, and the illness affects men and women equally. Source NAMI


Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
There is not any evidence of this every happening in biology.


There are over 6000 single point mutation diseases. Source Human Genome Project.



1 in 10 people have rare genetic diseases. This makes the overall rate very high. Source NORD.


"Since the 1950s rates of type 1 diabetes have been higher in Finland than anywhere else. "Why it's so high in Finland really is a mystery," says Valma Harjutsalo of the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki. What's more, she has found that the rate is increasing faster than ever (The Lancet, vol 371, p 1777). Between 1980 and 2005, the incidence in Finnish children aged 14 on up."


"THOUGH you might not guess it, Finland is the diabetes capital of the world. And solving the mystery of why type 1 diabetes is so prevalent in this Nordic country could be the key to teasing out the causes of the disease.
Worldwide, the incidence of type 1 diabetes, which generally occurs in childhood, is rising by 3.4 per cent each year. People with the disease lose the ability to make insulin, the hormone which controls blood glucose levels."

1 in 12 people have diabetes, caused again by genetic weakness and screwed up DNA coding. It continues to rise yearly and will be more than 1 in 10 in less than a year. Source every diabetes organization there is. diabetesDOTorg
There is an epidemic of Type 1 in Finland.



1 in 7 women have breast cancer. Just one type of cancer. Cancer has increased in its daily death rate by over 20% since 1948 when there were no treatments except to cut out tumors and watch them die. With all the modern treatments and millions of successes we are still dying faster from cancer than ever. Facts are easy to find. CDC, and Cancer Society.


33% of humans ages 15 to 64 will die of cancer. Many of the people with cancer have had a wake up call, when they realize the truth. Source The US Gov CDC.


Evodelusionism is magical nonsense. There are over 6000 genetic defects in the human genome, causing diseases and morons believe in evolution. How stupid are humans dick heads to believe such nonsense. There is only genetic degradation shown in ALL DNA studies. That means there is no evolution. You have to be a moron to believe in such magical nonsense. Your family, friends are all sick dying of these diseases and you believe in magical evolution? WTF?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spuZtAa80qI

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Jan 3rd, 2012 at 3:16am
There is ONLY a net genetic degradation shown in all DNA studies. The human genome project has served well to show how weak and how many defects we have amassed.  Yet the Evotards still want to believe in magical mutations that will fix all this.
There are no magical mutations that fix screwed up genetic coding. Once it is gone it is gone. There is no advancement towards more fit. There is only gene loss shown in ALL DNA STUDIES.
GoodScienceForYou 1 second ago
The evidence against any form of genetic improvement in humans is so overwhelming that only a retard could not understand this.
We are all genetically weak and sick from our lack of understanding of basic health issues and the science behind the cause of our genetic weaknesses. We are destroying our descendants chances for any sort of life worth living, out of our blatant disregard for the requirements for health.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 Pretty much every disease not caused by burns, guns, radiation leaks, car crashes, (not suicide, because that is caused by genetic mental disorders), drowning or any outside cause, can be considered to be genetic.
Name any disease, weakness, deformity, pain, and we can discuss it, and I will give you the medical reasons for it from my research.
GoodScienceForYou 51 seconds ago
2 of 2 Affected children also develop life-threatening problems in other organs and tissues, such as the liver, heart, and kidneys.[4387] Children with Zellweger syndrome usually do not survive beyond the first year of life. Zellweger syndrome is caused by mutations in any one of at least 12 genes; mutations in the PEX1 gene are the most common cause. It is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.[1598] There is no cure for Zellweger syndrome; treatment is generally symptomatic and supportive
GoodScienceForYou 8 minutes ago
@sol3a1 1 of 2 Zellweger syndrome is the most severe form of a spectrum of conditions called Zellweger spectrum disorders. The signs and symptoms of Zellweger syndrome typically appear during the newborn period and may include poor muscle tone (hypotonia), poor feeding, seizures, hearing loss, vision loss, distinctive facial features, and skeletal abnormalities.[1598][4837] .
GoodScienceForYou 8 minutes ago
You can go to NORD and look this up. The have the genetic defect for most of these 1200 diseases. Keep in mind there are more being found daily as the research on DNA is on going world wide now.
CES
Chromosome 22, Inverted Duplication (22pter-22q11)
Chromosome 22, Partial Tetrasomy (22pter-22q11)
Chromosome 22, Partial Trisomy (22pter-22q11)
Schmid-Fraccaro Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 12 minutes ago
The modern Italians of Sicily have better bone structure than most humans. This is because of retained bone strength.
The weakening of the wrist bones and the forearm bone that are prone to breaking is from genetic degeneration, loss of bone density and strength.
GoodScienceForYou 16 minutes ago
@sol3a1 Your back pain is caused by a deformed back. If you look at some of the ancient bone structures you will see much denser bone structures. The ancient Orrorin tugenensis which "scientists" believe is 6.1 million years old is a superior upright walking, human with much stronger bone structure. The femur is straighter and thicker the ball is supported much better.
GoodScienceForYou 17 minutes ago
@sol3a1 "There are no statistical backing for your presupposition"
Only if you never look for it. DUH!
Even dandruff is genetic, asthma, appendix rupture, hearing loss, blindness, baldness, dwarfism, flat feet, arthritis, back pain, deformed bones, retardation, carpal tunnel. Any affliction not caused by burns, smashing, guns, poison, radiation spills, drowning is genetic.
Pretty much all the normal things we put up with as "normal" are genetic diseases. And you think humans are improving?
GoodScienceForYou 23 minutes ago
correct : "heart disease".
GoodScienceForYou 31 minutes ago
Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome Borjeson-Forssman-Lehman Syndrome Botulism Bowen Disease Bowen Hutterite Syndrome Bowenoid Papulosis Brachial Plexus Palsy Brain Tumors, General Branchio Oculo Facial Syndrome Branchio Oto Renal Syndrome Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) Brown Sequard Syndrome Brown Syndrome Brucellosis Brugada Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 33 minutes ago
Behcet's Syndrome Bejel Bell's Palsy Benign Essential Tremor Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Bernard Soulier Syndrome Berylliosis Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Biliary Atresia, Extrahepatic Binswanger's Disease Biotinidase deficiency Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome Bjornstad Syndrome Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias-Cloacal Exstrophy Complex Blastomycosis Blepharophimosis, Ptosis, Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome Blepharospasm, Benign Essential Bloom Syndrome Blue Diaper Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 33 minutes ago
Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome Borjeson-Forssman-Lehman Syndrome Botulism Bowen Disease Bowen Hutterite Syndrome Bowenoid Papulosis Brachial Plexus Palsy Brain Tumors, General Branchio Oculo Facial Syndrome Branchio Oto Renal Syndrome Bronchiolitis Obliterans Organizing Pneumonia Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) Brown Sequard Syndrome Brown Syndrome Brucellosis Brugada Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 40 minutes ago
Behcet's Syndrome Bejel Bell's Palsy Benign Essential Tremor Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Bernard Soulier Syndrome Berylliosis Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy Biliary Atresia, Extrahepatic Binswanger's Disease Biotinidase deficiency Birt-Hogg-Dube Syndrome Bjornstad Syndrome Bladder Exstrophy-Epispadias-Cloacal Exstrophy Complex Blastomycosis Blepharophimosis, Ptosis, Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome Blepharospasm, Benign Essential Bloom Syndrome Blue Diaper Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 40 minutes ago
Next » Babesiosis Balantidiasis Baller Gerold Syndrome Balo Disease Bannayan Riley Ruvalcaba Syndrome Banti's Syndrome Barakat Syndrome Bardet Biedl Syndrome Barrett Esophagus Barth Syndrome Bartonellosis Bartter's Syndrome Batten Disease Beals Syndrome Beckwith Wiedemann Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 41 minutes ago
AIDS Dysmorphic Syndrome
Alagille Syndrome
Albinism, Ocular
Albinism, Oculocutaneous
Alexander Disease
Alkaptonuria
Alopecia Areata
GoodScienceForYou 42 minutes ago
Adams Oliver Syndrome Addison's Disease Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Adenylosuccinate Lyase Deficiency Adie Syndrome Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital (General) Adrenoleukodystrophy Adult Onset Still's Disease Adult Panic Anxiety Syndrome Afibrinogenemia, Congenital Agammaglobulinemia Agenesis of Corpus Callosum Agnosia, Primary Visual Agranulocytosis, Acquired Ahumada-Del Castillo Syndrome Aicardi Syndrome AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
GoodScienceForYou 44 minutes ago
Acquired Aplastic Anemia Acquired Neuromyotonia Acrocallosal Syndrome, Schinzel Type Acrodermatitis Enteropathica Acrodysostosis Acromegaly Acromesomelic Dysplasia Acromicric Dysplasia ACTH Deficiency Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
GoodScienceForYou 45 minutes ago
5-OxoprolinuriaNext » Aarskog Syndrome Aase Syndrome Abetalipoproteinemia Ablepharon Macrostomia Syndrome Acanthocheilonemiasis Acanthosis Nigricans Aceruloplasminemia Achalasia Achard Thiers Syndrome Achondrogenesis Achondroplasia Acidemia Isovaleric Acidemia, Methylmalonic Acidemia, Propionic Acne Rosacea Acoustic Neuroma
GoodScienceForYou 45 minutes ago
@sol3a1 1 in 15 have heard disease from genetic defects. Source CDC.
GoodScienceForYou 48 minutes ago
@sol3a1 1 in 10 have a "rare" genetic disease. That makes the total "rare" diseases not so rare. Source NORD National Organization of Rare Diseases
GoodScienceForYou 49 minutes ago
@sol3a1 1 in 12 have diabetes which is cause by genetic defects and triggered by environment. Type one diabetes is an autoimmune disease one of several caused by genetic defects. Type 2 has several genetic causes, from lowered insulin production to severe insulin resistance. All caused by genetic defects.
This is from absolute statistics that are easy to find. American Diabetes Society diabetesDOTorg
GoodScienceForYou

Again here are the statistics; 33% of humans age 15 to 64 will die from cancer in spite of the new treatments. Since 1948 when the first statistics were taken on daily cancer death it has risen over 20% in spite of the billions spent on treatments and the successful treatments. This is because of rapid genetic degradation from modern mutagens in just three generations.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Jan 5th, 2012 at 12:43pm
7 Atrophy. When a function is no longer used, it is not stimulated to function.
For instance there are blind fish because they live where there is no light, so the eyes do not develop. After a while they cannot develop. The genes that used to work atrophy.
In humans hair is far less because of shelter and clothing has eliminated a need for it, and humans constantly remove body hair. Baldness is a genetic defect by the way.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 6/ Drugs and alcohol. Anything that promotes cancer, or has any affect on the DNA can cause mutations.
Many of the prescription drugs have been taken off the market because they destroy cells in the human body and cause sickness.
Many of the FDA approved drugs made today are carcinogenic and mutagenic.
Most of the drugs used are designed to reduce body functions, not to increase health.
Anything that causes diseases (side effects) can cause mutations.
GoodScienceForYou 2 seconds ago
@sol3a1 5 continued.
Anything that can cause cancer can cause mutations in the fetus that can reproduce when the child reproduces.
Human papillomavirus not only can cause cancer, but can cause mutations in the fetus.
Anything that can cause cancer can cause mutations in the fetus.
GoodScienceForYou 2 seconds ago
@sol3a1
5/ Sexual conduct that gives rise to new mutant bacteria or virus.
The flesh eating bacteria comes to mind. Bacteria will "learn" to "eat" any carbon based digestible "food" it comes in contact with. It will modify itself to eat whatever it is presented with.
If you feed it human flesh, sperm, or have it in constant contact with human flesh, like anal sex, it will learn to eat human flesh.
During the reproductive act, placing it in a fertile vagina can cause mutations to the fetus.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 4 of X Mutations that survive and the offspring reproduces is where mutations get into the population.
4/ Radiation from radioactive minerals.  Radon is often found in the ground in certain areas. Radon causes cancer. Anything that can cause cancer can cause normal deleterious mutations.
If the egg, sperm, or fetus is hit with radiation it does cause mutations that destroy healthy cell replication and give rise to genetic diseases.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 3 of X.
3/ Toxic chemicals in foods. Toxic chemicals can also disturb the reproductive processes and cause mutations in the fetus. If a chemical can cause cancer, it can cause normal deleterious mutations that do not kill. We know that pesticides in food destroyed the reproduction of fish and birds. Brown pelicans almost extinct. Cannery row lost all its fish from this toxin.
People ate/eat foods with pesticides that cause mutations.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 2 of X If a mutation doesn't kill it reproduces.
2/ Radiation of the sexual reproductive processes. If a woman in her fertile years stands in front of a leaking microwave oven and the radiation hits the egg prior to joining with sperm or at conception or in the earliest part of the cell replication process of the fetus, it can cause mutations that are new and deleterious. If the mutation doesn't kill and the child reproduces then it becomes part of the population.
GoodScienceForYou 1 sec ago
@sol3a1 1 of X There is no random and there is no determinism. Those are not scientific ideas. Human DNA is getting destroyed by absolute causes; not magical ideas.
Those causes are from:
1 Human created microorganisms that hit the reproductive process and screw up the fetus. If the fetus survives and is able to reproduce then the mutation gets into the population.
Here is a video showing the results of mutations at conception that don't make it. /watch?v=abcsZZ9Duxw
GoodScienceForYou 2 seconds ago
@sol3a1 Whenever a stupid person who is in authority in "science" realizes he has nothing to use to fit a magical situation, he pulls the random card out of his ass and declares with great authority: "It must be random mutations".
There is no random. Once the universe was set in motion there is only cause and effect. Because you don't see a cause does not mean it does not exist. You just do not have the mental capacity to see more than one event at a time. I can keep track of hundreds.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Jan 7th, 2012 at 2:09pm
33% of humans ages 15 to 64 (under the OLD age limits) will die from cancer. The rate of cancer in children under 15 has gone up. "Over the past 20 years, there has been some increase in the incidence of children diagnosed with all forms of invasive cancer, from 11.5 cases per 100,000 children in 1975 to 14.8 per 100,000 children in 2004." 129% increase in incidents. More evidence we are degrading.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Jan 27th, 2012 at 6:45am
There are over 6800 genetic disease (actually more, but I like to be conservative).  We know these are caused by genetic degradation , because we can see the defects in the sick people.

We can also see the prior fit condition in living humans today.

We do not know the totaly gentic loss that humans have had on this path of genetic self distruction, but it is clear we are only going down in fitness.

These genes have been tracked with many of theses diseases are over 5000 years old. So we have been destroying our species for a long time out of our ignorance and unwillingness to listen to reason by people who know how to preserve the genome.

There is no evolution from simple life to complex, because there is no evidence of that.  This is the religion of Evodelusionism, the belief that we evolved from fish.

There is only evidence of genetic degradation and reduced fitness in all DNA studies on any of the mammals we have DNA on.

If we want to preserve what is left of our humanity before we degrade into short life suffering animals with all sorts of diseases, then we may want to look at the real evidence we have and stop this mutagen addiction we have.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by 72DEW2 on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:40pm

Quote:
Gravity is a law of science.  It operates exactly the same in an absolutely predictable way under the same exact conditions.  This cannot be falsified.  In every real science we can eventually predict all outcomes, if we understand all the conditions and have ways of testing it.  So far we have seen gravity work the same under the same conditions for as long as we have studied it.


the "law of science". does that even make sense? you are saying that there are a set of laws binding "science"?

guess what? gravity unfortunately isnt what you think it is, einstein has proven newton wrong. newton claimed it was a FORCE, but einstein has proven it wrong by discovering it was only a distortion in the time-space web. einstein only have mathematical evidence. of course this is enough since it has already been put into application.

but evolution has more imperical evidence, application and "mathematical" evidence than einstein's relativity does.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 9:59am

72DEW2 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2012 at 10:40pm:

Quote:
Gravity is a law of science.  It operates exactly the same in an absolutely predictable way under the same exact conditions.  This cannot be falsified.  In every real science we can eventually predict all outcomes, if we understand all the conditions and have ways of testing it.  So far we have seen gravity work the same under the same conditions for as long as we have studied it.


the "law of science". does that even make sense? you are saying that there are a set of laws binding "science"?

guess what? gravity unfortunately isnt what you think it is, einstein has proven newton wrong. newton claimed it was a FORCE, but einstein has proven it wrong by discovering it was only a distortion in the time-space web. einstein only have mathematical evidence. of course this is enough since it has already been put into application.

but evolution has more imperical evidence, application and "mathematical" evidence than einstein's relativity does.



Like I said gravity follows exacting laws of science.

When you decided to believe people who have no clue about how the laws of science operate then you caved to delusions.

The primary law of science is the "Law of Cause and Effect".

There is no science without it.

When morons don't follow this law, and make up idiotic claims in science, you know they are genetically degraded morons.

I want you to start answering my questions.  These questions can set you free from delusions if you have any degree of innate intelligence. If you don't all the teaching I have will not fix you.

Where is you absolutely irrefutable physical evidence that proves evolution; that fish evolved into humans?   You cannot use any opinions of any sort, only evidence.

Start there. 

In real science we wait for physical evidence that is obvious, clear, irrefutable, BEFORE we make any theory. 

When religious nonsense is placed in schools they take away your mind and control it with slogans and needs to belong to some screwed up ideology. 

In the 44 years that I have studied evolution, I have only seen religious slogans used to support this nonsense.

Title: Re: Evolution Simplified
Post by GoodScienceForYou on Apr 1st, 2012 at 5:09pm
Rats and mice on the endangered species list.

2 of X More Rats and mice on the endangered species list: Allen's Cotton Rat, Alpine Woolly Rat, Armenian Birch Mouse, Arnhem Land Rock Rat,Beach Mouse, Ashaninka Oldfield Mouse, Barbour's Vlei Rat, Bartels's Rat, Big-headed Mole Rat, Bismarck Giant Rat, Black-tailed Deer Mouse, Black-wristed Deer Mouse, Blick's Grass Rat, Bolivian Chinchilla Rat, Bonhote's Mouse, Bougainville Giant Rat, Brazilian Arboreal Mouse, Broad-toothed Mouse, Buenos Aires Leaf-eared Mouse, Burt's Deer Mouse,
GoodScienceForYou in reply to odinata 1 second ago
Reply
1 of x All you have to do is to look at the ancient rat predecessors and this is obvious. They are far more complex in bone structure have much more mechanical mobility and movement in the joints. Far more capable of survival. That is why they continued to exist and have degenerated into rats and mice.  It is just a matter of time before most rats and mice are on the endangered species list along with the kangaroo rat, salt marsh harvest Mouse, Allegheny wood rat,

GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4!
YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.