I've been trying to puzzle this out, the best i can come up with is a very poor spelling error for flatulance.

Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 8:54am:

I've been trying to puzzle this out, the best i can come up with is a very poor spelling error for flatulance.

I figured it was a reference to fecal matter.

oh_noes wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 9:01am:

Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 8:54am: I've been trying to puzzle this out, the best i can come up with is a very poor spelling error for flatulance. I figured it was a reference to fecal matter.

Then why not call it fecal matter of feces?

Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 9:05am:

oh_noes wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 9:01am: Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 8:54am: I've been trying to puzzle this out, the best i can come up with is a very poor spelling error for flatulance. I figured it was a reference to fecal matter. Then why not call it fecal matter of feces?

I dunno

oh_noes wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 9:55am:

Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 9:05am: oh_noes wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 9:01am: Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 27th, 2009 at 8:54am: I've been trying to puzzle this out, the best i can come up with is a very poor spelling error for flatulance. I figured it was a reference to fecal matter. Then why not call it fecal matter of feces? I dunno

Oh, I know! I know! Me! Me! Me!

http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/fail-owned-misspelled-dictionary-book-fail.jpg

Actually, I think it's a subtle reference to having an Irish origin, ie what the feck are ye on abeout, Lance?.

GSFY micturates on the English language regularly, so I can well imagine him referring to bvllsh1t as bovine feculence verbally at parties thinking he sounds erudite.

http://www.engrish.com//wp-content/uploads/2009/10/takezumi.jpg

prolescum wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 10:44am:

Actually, I think it's a subtle reference to having an Irish origin, ie what the feck are ye on abeout, Lance?. GSFY micturates on the English language regularly, so I can well imagine him referring to bvllsh1t as bovine feculence verbally at parties thinking he sounds erudite. http://www.engrish.com//wp-content/uploads/2009/10/takezumi.jpg

Engrish FTW \o/

fec·u·lent  (fky-lnt)
adj.
Full of foul or impure matter; fecal.
[Middle English, from Latin faeculentus, heavy with sediment, from faex, faec-, dregs.]
fecu·lence n.

---

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 28^th, 2009 at 11:39am:

fec·u·lent  (fky-lnt) adj. Full of foul or impure matter; fecal. [Middle English, from Latin faeculentus, heavy with sediment, from faex, faec-, dregs.] fecu·lence n.

And what we see here is a pile of garbage:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/regional_editions/globe_west/west/pile%20of%20garbage.jpg

glowingape wrote on Dec 28^th, 2009 at 3:24pm:

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 28th, 2009 at 11:39am: fec·u·lent  (fky-lnt) adj. Full of foul or impure matter; fecal. [Middle English, from Latin faeculentus, heavy with sediment, from faex, faec-, dregs.] fecu·lence n. And what we see here is a pile of garbage: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/regional_editions/globe_west/west/pile%20of%20garbage.jpg

Human consumer superfluous garbage.

glowingape wrote on Dec 28^th, 2009 at 3:24pm:

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 28th, 2009 at 11:39am: fec·u·lent  (fky-lnt) adj. Full of foul or impure matter; fecal. [Middle English, from Latin faeculentus, heavy with sediment, from faex, faec-, dregs.] fecu·lence n. And what we see here is a pile of garbage: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/regional_editions/globe_west/west/pile%20of%20garbage.jpg

It looks identical to the Theory of Evodelusion.

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 3:56pm:

It looks identical to the Theory of Evodelusion.

That's very mature. I'm sure, that people must be proud of you.

glowingape wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 4:36pm:

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 30th, 2009 at 3:56pm: It looks identical to the Theory of Evodelusion. That's very mature. I'm sure, that people must be proud of you.

The ultimate immaturity is to think that other people's opinions have any effect on your thinking. That is how children are mislead, like you, into b u l l s h i t.

"If you are concerned with other's opinions, you will never find the truth."  Swami Muktananda

"People use what they fear as "weapons" against the truth."
James Arjuna

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 4:50pm:

The ultimate immaturity is to think that other people's opinions have any effect on your thinking. That is how children are mislead, like you, into b u l l s h i t.

I wonder... Since you've so eagerly put a word filter on the forum, why are you writing profanity? Does that maybe have anything to do... I don't know... Failed attempt of control and you're afraid to admit it?

I thought so.


Quote:

"If you are concerned with other's opinions, you will never find the truth."  Swami Muktananda "People use what they fear as "weapons" against the truth." James Arjuna

Such a good thing, that you're the only one, that's obsessed with the "truth" you repeat like a broken record. Specially since you've never bothered to tell us what "truth" is. And it's even better, that there's no scientific concept of "truth"

When you remove all that you think is false...Then remove all that you think is true...Then remove all that you are absolutely sure is true, and then remove all that you are positive that is true, all that is left is the truth.

The world is just a play of consciousness, raw energy set in motion by the foundations of science.

glowingape wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 4:59pm:

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 30th, 2009 at 4:50pm: The ultimate immaturity is to think that other people's opinions have any effect on your thinking. That is how children are mislead, like you, into b u l l s h i t. I wonder... Since you've so eagerly put a word filter on the forum, why are you writing profanity? Does that maybe have anything to do... I don't know... Failed attempt of control and you're afraid to admit it? I thought so. Quote: "If you are concerned with other's opinions, you will never find the truth."  Swami Muktananda "People use what they fear as "weapons" against the truth." James Arjuna Such a good thing, that you're the only one, that's obsessed with the "truth" you repeat like a broken record. Specially since you've never bothered to tell us what "truth" is. And it's even better, that there's no scientific concept of "truth"

You are good at avoiding the truth.  That is not a good quality.

The truth is you are brainwashed by your poor choices and that you cave in to other people way to easily.  You are not a good guardian over your mind. You let pressures of society dictate who you are.  That is sad.

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Jan 1^st, 2010 at 8:19pm:

Then remove all that you are absolutely sure is true, and then remove all that you are positive that is true, all that is left is the truth.

I am really confused. Are you saying that you acknowledge evolution afterall?

metha wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2010 at 8:17am:

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Jan 1st, 2010 at 8:19pm: Then remove all that you are absolutely sure is true, and then remove all that you are positive that is true, all that is left is the truth. I am really confused. Are you saying that you acknowledge evolution afterall?

The idea is to remove all HEMG from the perspectives.

There is no physical evolution in organic life.  There is only a constant flux or constant change that has no intention of evolution to more complex, but is only adaptation of the genome to survive as the same foundational creature, until it can no longer survive.  That is all that we know from all the evidence we have.  All of the changes in the genome are for survival as the same creature, but you never see a horse become an elephant.  You never see a cow become a whale.  (These idiots actually believe that happened, with no actual evidence.)

Anything else, beyond survival as the same creatures, is fantasy made up from the inability to just observe.  People are brainwashed into these dumb ass beliefs and they "see" with "evoldelusion glasses", and they twist their minds around this dumb ass belief. 

If you take a child and submit them to PBS, and all the propaganda on this crap belief, they don't stand a chance to be free thinkers. They want to conform to mommy's and daddy's beliefs,or to the teacher's beliefs, or to their peer's beliefs.  Then they surround themselves with other believers to reinforce the belief and "validate" themselves, just like sex perverts, "validate" who were molested, will perpetuate the belief that they are OK and so they molest other children and wonder why they are considered "wrong".  There is not much difference in the parallel.  One is a physical f#ck. The other is a mind f#ck.

How can you get that from my statements?  If anything there is "devolution" with all the contaminations in the genome.


The process of finding the truth, is to eliminate all that you think is true, because all that you believe is part of what stops you from "seeing" the truth. The truth is that everything is a perception of the imposed mind on what you perceive.  Without the perceiver, nothing exists.  When you get to the point of being the "witness of your mind", then you are free.  The kingdom of heaven lies within you.

Humans contract their universe to fit perceptions, because we are humans.  Most everything you believe is from a perspective of human mind/emotions.   The mind is a terrible master, but is a good slave.  When one can get control of one's mind, you become the master of the universe, because you are no longer the slave of mind.  That "mind" includes mostly emotionally driven thoughts.  Memory is like a sponge that responds by emotion.  Some people are born with a much more abstract mind that is more objective.  Those who are completely objective and "live outside themselves" are able to get free from delusions.

"A person starts to live when he can live outside himself." Albert Einstein.

That which you are looking for is that which is looking.

The story of the musk deer describes this.  This deer runs around looking for the source of this wonderful fragrance.  It will run and run and run until it collapses. When it falls down it's head accidentally falls on its navel, the source of the fragrance.

Meditation is one of the main ways to find your source. From that perspective, you never fall again to logical fallacy. From that perspective you understand the source of logical fallacies.

True science is based on removing your "perspectives" from what you see.  Once you have beliefs, you are no longer objective.

Even in a pure science you have to make allowances for the tools used by the perceiver and their, tools,  effects on the experiment.  Your body in the room can have an effect on the coin toss. When all the mechanics, physics, points to "tails" by a slim (energy) margin and your body's mass,electric charge,magnetism, gravity, is enough to change the final drop to heads.  It is never random.

If you are not seeking the truth in all things, then what are you seeking?

The only thing left is to seek to reinforce beliefs.