As an example.  If you were to fall into a watering hole today and die, you would be petrified in some amount of time and all your organic matter would be destroyed and replaced with the minerals that surround your bones.  This is "replacement" fossilization. The method used on most all of the "hominids" and any fossil that has no carbon.

Because the minerals in the watering hole were 5 million years old, it would be determined at the time if excavation of your fossil that you were over 5 million years old, because the ground you fell in was that old.
This is the most ridiculous method of dating anything I have ever come across. How can people be that stupid to be conned into something that is based on the assumption that the earth you fell in is the same age as you!
Damn! That is total ignorance!

This method of dating actually destroys most of the fossil record and in particular "hominids".

oh_noes wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 5:16am:


How many time are you going to not read my posts. or listen to my videos?

oh_noes wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 12:32pm:


When people repeat the same exact thing that I am saying, then say it is wrong, shows that you can't read.  You are projecting what you think I said.

You cannot measure with radiometric dating any of the following,  the "dirt" "rocks" or anything surrounding the fossil and say this is the absolute truth about the date of these bones before they were petrified.

I call it putting the bones in a box then dating the box and saying the 6 million year old box is the same age as the 3000 year old petrified bones.
Once there is no tissue, all you have is blind ass belief in assumptions. That is not science.

You are free to believe whatever will perpetuate your emotionally driven warm fuzzies that make you feel so smart.
However, in the real world of physics, assumptions are not testable. They are not science.

oh_noes wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 2:53pm:


The geographic column  and these ice columns are standardized by what?  If you have no standard to date with because the radiometric dating system is so screwed up and worthless, then what is the date of anything. 

You must have a reference point in time and space that is absolutely proven.  You do not have that. You have human emotional mental garbage, beliefs and assumptions.

That is NOT SCIENCE.   I feel sorry for you. It must be sad to realize that these idiots are brainwashed who taught you.

Berlinski is right on!

glowingape wrote on Dec 24^th, 2009 at 7:18pm:



I listen to your opinions but they are not based on any real evidence. 

Berlinski agrees with me, because he is not a f**king pawn like you.

Volcano Girl wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 9:39am:


You do not understand what pure logic and reason is. It has been taught out of you.
You need to take back your mind from those you gave it too. All beliefs are bad. I have not found any human beliefs to be valid. Beliefs destroy the credibility in all scientists who have them. You cannot be rational, responsible and honest if your belief in things that have no absolute, irrefutable evidence. Don't you know that?

glowingape wrote on Dec 30^th, 2009 at 12:53pm:



The study of genetics has nothing in common with some fantasy of any form of transitional creatures, evolution, nor fish that became human over some immense time. There is absolutely no evidence for this taking place, because there is no evidence for this taking place.

And these Evodelusionists, never think beyond their brainwashing. The "elephant" is huge in the room and the "elephant" is this human garbage belief behind every dumb ass thought.  Evolution is fraud.  It is a religious idea, in mythological creatures, magical processes, and mystical events.

Do you actually believe that fish or mice, great primates, or WTF, eventually evolved into humans, and what evidence do you use to justify such nonsense?

Just answer the question.