Updated March 6, 2011
We can see there is no "evolution" in evidence, anywhere on this earth, unless you have a deeply held religoius belief from academia forcing this belief on you.
For over 150 years this idea of simple life becoming more complex, seemed plausible to many. But for all but the last 20 years we did not have the DNA data to really support or not support this idea.
The DNA does not support this idea of evolution at all. Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.It was this video that caused me to make my first hypothesis that Chimps came from interbreeding between humans and some missing apes some 4,000 years ago. Everything this guy says backs up that hypothesis, while he thinks this is proof of evolution.
Today after much more detailed study the original hypothesis is gone, because it has too many road blocks, and as a scientist I have developed a theory now because
all of the evidence we have now supports it, perfectly.
It is proof of the "Law of Genetic Stability" that I propose as obvious and shown in all the facts found in all of biology. Genetic stability is what supports and holds a species genetic structures,
until something acts on the DNA to "toxify" and destroy the original DNA structures. There is no evolution towards more complex. We only have what we have and we must protect that.
The Law of Genetic stability: The creature remains in a genetic lineage passing healthy genetic coding until mutagens act as a downgrading (devolving) of features until extinction.
When the foundational genetics can no longer adapt it or the mutagens reduce fitness the species dies.
It does not change into some other type of life. A mammal never becomes a fish and a fish never becomes a mammal. What ever the magical belief is.
We know from science that the human genome is degrading. It is not improving. We know that people have more and more genetic imperfections and are not getting any "better". This is an absolute fact found in all the data on medical sites about genetic problems we have.
Chimps and Humans are TOO CLOSE genetically to be anything but directly related by normal genetic reasons. There is NO magical, other plausibility that is as accurate to all of the evidence. The only accurate hypothesis that fits all the evidence is that: older species of superior humans are the common ancestor of the other great primates/ great apes. That apes are degnenerated humans and humans are not apes because apes are a downgraded genetic humans. The great primates are a degradation or degeneration of the Human Genome.The mass of common ERV's have to be transmitted by interbreeding by procreation and reproduction or by new infections that happen to hit the same location (no other way), and by no other method
to have this much in common. ( There is an extremely small possibility of some by infection as well, because that is how they got there in the first place.)
That chimps are the degredation of the human genome, just like dogs are the genetic degredation of Wolves.
If humans bred with this inferior "human" chimp (at a developmental, de-evolution, stage where breeding could still take place), then any number of creatures can be brought into existence that have human characteristics. It is possible that Chimps, (before too much de-evolution) and Humans bred to produce the Neanderthal and all of the DNA supports that hypothesis as of this date (Jan 24, 2011)(again at Mar 6 2011)
Humans are smarter, more dexterous, more able to survive than Chimps. The oldest humans were much stronger, had stronger immune systems, stronger bones, and larger brain capacity and far better, synoptic connectoins, (better computer).
It is a "horrible" idea that we are degrading but it is factual in all the evidence. We are not more intelligent than our ancestors. We simply have had more technological discoveries to use with what existing intelligence we have left.
The human brain was made with way more capacity than we have used. However, as we continue to radiate, contact with toxic chemical, and biological infections causing mutations, our brains, and total genome, you can see the results by looking at chimps, gorillas and orangutans.
(Exceptionally intelligent people simply use more of their brain than most humans, because they do not let emotional "reasons" control thoughts. They also don't fear anyone and they certainly do not find any need to conform to human beliefs, not founded on absolutely irrefutable evidence.)
The sad thing is that many of those technological discoveries are helping to speed up or genetic degradation. see my Cancer Video.
Wolves are stronger, smarter, more cunning hunters, and fully able to survive in the wild. Dogs are degraded with many genetic diseases, cancer, bone dysfunctions, and some can barely walk (Bulldogs). But dogs can still breed with their "parent" of the genetic lineage. Humans may or may not, because we have not seen this attempted for ethical reasons. The 46 chromosomes caused by a fusion and a few other genetic differences can stop this breeding, making chimps a fully speciated devolved from human species.
Humans passing down ERV's and DNA to direct descendants who were subjected to radiation or any natural cause can degrade a whole tribe to the level of Chimps. (radiation, toxins in water, diseases we know nothing about because these things have changed as the volcanic radioactive materials have decayed and have been washed away.)
We have never seen any genetic improvements in humans (or dogs or any species) from the original. We know that there is a correct way for the gene expression to work because we can see it in people (and genome of all creatures) without genetic degradation in certain parts of the gene expression. We know that humans were better. We can judge the healthy way genes look in people who do not have a particular genetic disease and compare that gene with the people expressing that disease.
We can look to see the exact protean construction of healthy cells. We can also see the protean constrution of cells that do not function fully. And we can see the cells that are just "sick" from degredation in the many recognized diseases. We now have over 4000 of those mapped. Finally we can see the remnants of gene expressions that are no longer functioning at all. These are the ones that by lack of use, are no longer needed, but may be triggered by environment to resurface and be usable again, called atavisms.
There is NOTHING NEW in the human genome or the genome of any creature.
There are over 70% of the mutations are bad, deleterious to the human genome and 29% are considered neutral, ONE percent might be positive. That is 70 to 1 against this religious mythological idea of "evolution".
Degradation of the genome and is ALL we know for sure.We know that continual reproduction of genetic weakness will eventually weaken humans to the point of extinction. We have mapped thousands of genetic caused illnesses.
on DonExodus, By the way this guy is so weak that he bans all who question his belief. He is your typical fanatic believer in Evodelusionism and is utterly afraid of me. I asked this DonExodus a few questions and he banned me. Cowards are common with people who cave into beliefs that are shoved in their face by society.
All religious HEMG needs to be removed from public schools and Evodelusionism is a mythological religion.
The first mapping of DNA of Neanderthals showed much more
"Chimpanzee like creatures". This is because they were only looking at mDNA which is transferred to offspring by the mother only. That means that the "mother" of the Neanderthals is most probably an ancient Chimp creature.
Considering that Chimps at one time were a de-evolved partially speciated, from the genetic human lineage, this is the most logical reason for the mDNA showing "chimp like". The scientists originally stated that Neanderthals were not humans at all, now they can see they were from the same genetic lineage as humans.
In the latest DNA it is from the center of the cell DNA and shows that we are related and "probably bred humans and Neanderthal". It is more likely that humans and chimps bred to create the Neanderthal.
This is the really nice guy who mapped out the Neanderthal's DNA. He has many misconceptions to overcome. I have listened to him and he has the typical indoctrination into the religious ideas of Evodelusionism.
Paalo
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100506-science-neanderthals-huma...