The more research on this Chimp human and primate phenomenon reveals many things as we pile on the evidence.
"The Theory of Evolution" is nothing but a bunch of religious slogans. There is no evidence for evolution, but a lot of evidence for gradual degradation of all species and extinction from environmental issues. There is no net positive change in any species. If your idea of evolution is degradation of the genome of most all the species, you are right. There is no improvement shown anywhere.
Chimps and Primates are degraded spin offs of humans. Humans were obviously first then Chimps came from humans. That is clear. There is no evolution but there is only a continual net degradation to all genomes and extinction from environmental poisons..
In all of my studies on this idea of "mutation" what I see is simply the same DNA patterns repeating that have already been shown in the species. There is no "new" changes to the DNA, but there is a programmed response to the toxins of environment and bad foods, like the huge amounts of hydrogenated oils that cause clogged arteries. The body will pull up any pre coding that is available to survive with and make adaptations, but no evolution.
In each genome is the programming that was established in the beginning. And part of that programming is in response to environment. It is intelligent programming that takes into account all "toxic" possibilities. When we see differences in the DNA from the parent to the child there is only one cause of those differences: passed down traits from the genetic lineage. There is no such possibility of any random change, because random is death. If one base pare being off can cause severe illness, imagine what 100 or so random changes can do?---Extinction
There is no such thing as evolution shown in any evidence. The Galapagos finches are a perfect example of adapting based upon a deep level of genome programming. The beaks get bigger, then smaller, with no net change. This is because the ability to adapt in different directions is build in the programming of the species.
Now adapting has never shown any improvements over the foundational genetic make up of a species. Never. The only, obvious purpose of adaptation is for the creature to survive AS THE SAME CREATURE.
We can see DNA gene expressions for the synthesis of vitamin C, but it is no longer functional, due to a net degradation of the Genome of all creatures with this pattern. We have cancer caused by DNA defects. Diabetes, Sickle cell anemia, Alzheimer's, and a list of hundreds of genetic diseases that don't go away by any form of "improvements". If there were "random" improvements to any species this crap would simply go away "magically" by itself. It continues to degrade.
When you do a study on the great primates it is clear that they have human characteristics. It is also clear that they are a much younger species, because 1/ the scarcity of any fossils 2. the only evidence we have is younger than Humans, and the only way to get the ERV's and the DNA shown in the chimp is by a direct genetic link that came FROM early humans when they had the 48 chromosomes. Since there is ONLY shown a continual degradation of the Human Genome, what we see in Chimps is the ability to speak is gone, but they have a fantastically fast memory. This is because the speech is an impediment to memory. The tests shown on the Neutral Evolution Forum Videos shows Chimps performing amazing tasks far better than any human. The logical parts are retarded from the degradation of the human genome they inherited, either by a direct genetic lineage or by interbreeding.
Then you must start to consider the plausibility that fit the laws of genetics and all of the other evidence, particularly the fact that we have no real fossil of a chimp and we have only 4000 year old artifacts.
We know that environmental issues, like radioactive materials in the ground, water, and toxic poisons can cause damage to the DNA of any creature. If they don’t kill off the creature, then it will degrade the DNA and the only result IF IT SURVIVES, IS A NET DEGREDATION.
When you look at the DNA of the Chimp and see that is has approximately 95% of the human genome, but it has 48 chromosomes, you can easily see it as a degraded human.
Keep in mind that it is clear in the Human Genome has a fusion in the number 2 Chromosome that matches perfectly with the Chimp Chromosomes. This is shown by the Telomeres in the center and the two centromeres. Telomeres only appear at the ends of chromosomes. Base pair 114,455,823,214, 823 to 828.
The chimp genome is a degradation of the Human Genome and it fits perfectly with the science.
So how could this happen? When the earth was young and wild, with primitive humans, they broke off into “tribes” as they do now. You can see this pattern in all of the human cultures. We still have tribes today and we go to war with them, because humans are still controlled by emotions.
So if you have a tribe of humans off by themselves and something happens to the drinking water, the food is contaminated with radioactive matter we can easily see a scenario where the degradation of the genome could accelerate. The portions of the genome affected are mostly in the brain but also in the morphology of the chimp, the now degraded human genome that has become the Chimp species of primates.
We have never seen any improvements to the human genome and we know for sure there are degredations takeing place because we can see them all over the human genome maps in all people. We see defective genetics in every human. We have mapped in the thousands of DNA coding sequences that show up in people with hundreds of diseases.
We now have women getting their ovaries and breasts removed to stop cancer because the “genes” for cancer are in the family and in particular women’s DNA. Women with the mother, dying from cancer and sisters dying of cancer are now having a look at their DNA and getting this surgery to stop this disease and it works. It is crud because what needs to be done is to find a way to correct the DNA patters to that of a healthy woman.
If there was any form of “evolution” the human genome would be improving and magically removing the causes of these diseases. There is no magic and there is no evolution, there is only a net degradation of the genome.
What about these “random mutations” shown in the DNA?
First of all there is no such thing as random. It is not a scientific phenomenon. There is only cause and effect or cause and result in the universe. If a science tells you that it is better than physics, or chemistry and math, and it can perform miracles that violate the first law of science then it is not science, but is a pseudo science based on belief and faith.
What is shown in the DNA is “differences”. They can not be called “mutations” because “mutations” mean changed DNA. If all we are actually seeing is a patter that repeats in the human species and especially in the ancestry of the offspring with these “differences” then they cannot be called ‘mutations” because they are not changes from any existing patterns that have already been used. There is no such thing as Evolution, with magical causes. There are only causes that make scientific sense.
You cannot scramble DNA and have a creature live. If one base pair can cause severe diseases and death, then scramble 100 to 150 and you have death for sure and if it is dead it can’t reproduce. There is no such thing as “random mutations” in any creature. They all have causes and most are from the programming deep in the parents genome.
The other principle is that DNA is not the cause of itself. Repeat that a few hundred times. DNA is the expression of a cause that is unknown. All matter is the expression of a cause. Just because these fools can’t see the cause, does not give them the audacity to not see that there is no such thing as random and there is nothing that is the cause of itself.
The only place where information comes from is from the existing coding in the ancestors passed down into the parents.
The place where screw ups happen are from drastic poisons in the environment or even in the womb, that cause base pairs to be disturbed and not be normal and all that I have seen so far are just a very few will cause this. That is why they are so hard to find in 3.2 billion base pairs. We are just beginning to see how messed up the human genome really is. How imperfect humans are.
We also know that there is a “perfect” way for these patterns to show as indicated in the genome of people who do not have theses diseases. This indicates that the genome is degrading gradually over time and that the mixing of these patterns will keep them from all grouping into the entire human culture to cause extinction too soon.
This means that these defects are being reproduced in people who are breeding before the illness kills them. Most of these diseases, like cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, sickle cell anemia, and the hundreds that we have mapped so far are being transmitted to the general population and over time they will be in more and more people as they propagate throughout the human species.
The only way to purify this is to kill off all the people with these genetic defects or sterilize them, or find a way to fix the defect. Which do you prefer?
If scientists were to stop believing in archaic religious ideas like “Evolution” which is really “Evodelusion”, and just see what is actually shown in evidence that would be a good start. With that “brain fart” of wearing “Evodelusion glasses” on every experiment with DNA and messing with pure logic, it is retarding research into the fulfillment of the cure for these diseases.
The good coding is known. The process to make the bad DNA coding with the “cancer” gene to match the good coding of people who do not have cancer, like someone who has smoked for 40 years and has no cancer cells, would be a good start. This is the most obvious. Killing off the cancer carriers is not going to work in a civilized society. Hitler tried that and he only killed of a few thousand of the defective people, but never got rid of the genetics that produced them.
Ken Miller who is an "Evotard" (mentally retarded by faith and belief in Evodelusionism), has presented the best evidence for Chimps being the offspring of Human ancestors better than I could express it. After you understand that the
common ancestor of both humans and chimps
is a human, you are on the way to freedom from this religious nonsense based on faith.
Listen carefully to this presentation realizing all that I just told you.
This video is the most compelling evidence against evolution that I have ever seen.
Chimps are utter evidence of de-evolution and they started from the same superhuman ancestor as we did. This is obvious. Chimps are a result of isolation, living with limited resources and lots of toxins to destroy the advanced human characteristics of brain and cranium capacity. They are retarded humans and evidence of what evolution is really about. DE-EVOLUTION as the genome is degraded by bad living.