GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 15^th, 2009 at 5:27pm:


"In biology, evolution is change in the genetic material of a population of organisms through successive generations. Although the changes produced in a single generation are normally small, the accumulation of these differences over time can cause substantial changes in a population, a process that can result in the emergence of new species.[1] Similarities among species suggest that all known species descended from a common ancestor (or ancestral gene pool) through this process of gradual divergence.[2]"

The almighty wikipedia. And other books, that are more or less related with biology say the same.

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 1:03am:

Again; Evolution never suggested anything like you've said. It's just change of genetic material over successful generations.

And if you're asking about evidence of "changing morphology", that has "never been observed", here is one quite common: Caterpillars -> Butterfly.

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 1:46am:

What "opinions"?
Quote:

What's this "law of genetic stability" you're talking about? In 30 years of dealing with biology, I haven't heard anything like that...

Quote:

If you've studied "this" for 40 years, some knowledge of "this" would show... Whatever "this" is...

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 2:44am:

Whoa, whoa, whoa...
Since you didn't even get the definition of "evolution" correct, how would be even remotely possible for you to refute anything connected to evolution?

You believe that evolution is something, that the definition doesn't even suggest. So yeah. You're strawmaning the definition of evolution.

glowingape wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 3:18am:


The argument you are using is the latest defense mechanism for this religious belief in mystical causes, and magical processes.

I have studied this for 40 years and this is what is in the whole of this theory:  I only seek the truth on this matter and nothing else. But I have never seen anything but the laws of genetics in play.

Starting from a "watered down" idea that normal genetics and normal adaptation of creatures is equal to some mass changes over some immense time is not what evolutions dogma is. This is the huge stretch from the actual evidence and the belief.


1/ The Theory of Evolution startes with the idea that life came from no life. That some spontaneous life came from minerals and from some accidental random events. You cannot deny this by classifying it as abiogenesis.  You cannot take parts away and call it a hole system of "scientific" (religious) thought.

2/ That from very small creatures, one cell, all life "evolved" over some immense time with no direction or programming.

3/ That all life forms "evolved" from marine life.  That this marine life eventually "evolved" and decided to grow legs, lungs and breath air and become reptiles.

4/ That these fish-reptiles eventually evolved into mammals and birds.

5/ That speciation some how proves "1" through "4", when the only evidence is a genealogy within the genus and no lizard has become anything but another lizard, but because the lizard or any creature has changed or adapted is projected out to some imaginary transformation with no physical evidence.  No bird has become anything other than a bird. That no bacteria has become anything but bacteria.  The small horse eventually becomes a large horse and the breeds all came from the small horse. This does not show any evolution into any other creatures or genus.

6/ That the inference of the changes in the DNA between generations somehow proves evolution, when with each generation in the last 70 million years of creatures that still exist, there have been no mutations that show any changes to any species beyond simple adaptions to the environment. 

7/ The finale premises of evolution is that creatures can violate the laws of genetics by "magical thinking" and turn into an entirely new species and genus.   I have yet to see any evidence of that.

    

The best thing a person can do is to regain their natural objective perspective that they are born with and give up all the brainwashing you have gotten along the way.  It is a simple thing to step back and go over each and every belief that has been shoved down your figurative throat by the people who love you, your friends, family, parents, teachers, preachers and get away from it as far as you can.
Realizing that it is all the folly of human beings and not to be taken as truth.  There is no truth until is is absolutely proven to you.  If you have no absolute evidence, then don't believe any of it. How can you not understand this?
It is obvious.

"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing." Albert Einstein"

"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be."
Albert Einstein

You must find your own truth far away from all the brainwashing.

By the way aerodynamics,physics, chemistry, electronics, atomic theory (and laws), most science has science in it, but evolution is a religion with no merit.  Evolution is a religion BS by clear definition of relying only on faith and belief. There is not a tiny bit of reality in it except for the normal common everyday genetics, which shows clearly that evolution is not possible.
The only part that is real is genetics.  But this belief has grossly screwed up genetics and the drug supply with toxic and neuro toxic drugs, being sold as prescriptions.

The really intelligent people, are not going to go to university and get a degree in religious bovine garbage.  So we have the lowest common denominator in the education system of people willing to give up all logic and reason to get a paycheck.

We are creating a world of nitwits and chemical zombies with this crap religion.   It needs to stop being taught because all religious bovine garbage should not be included in science.

metha wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 8:39am:


Oops, sorry, I meant genius.


oh_noes seems like an intelligent person, so why he falls for this evolution thing is beyond me.

metha wrote on Dec 16^th, 2009 at 10:22am:



It is a cultural thing in the UK.  The pressure to conform is intense.  You are considered to be "ignorant" if you don't believe in the religion of Evodelusionism.

They are spoon fed ideas that develop belief.

Watch my three videos on this.  It goes in detail on how people surrender up their objective reasoning to family, culture, and icons of society.

I tried to make these videos as simple as possible to get past these delusions imposed on children.