Oicurmtoyoy wrote on Nov 14th, 2010 at 11:17am:2 things I forgot to mention
1. Vestigial organs. Evolution also explains why vestigial organs exist, like hand bones in whales, or maybe those little red thing in the corners of you eyes. They're explained completely by evolution, which makes it fit even more with Occam's razor.
2. You said that you had evidence that contradicts evolution. I recall you saying this in our you tube discussion. please present it.
This is one of the important posts on here, so I used "Sex" in the title to get you here.
In science we do not work with reasonable doubt, nor with analogy at all. We do not use any assumptions at all and call that "truth". We do not elevate a theory to the level of facts. A theory must be proven millions of times to be near perfect before it can be considered to be scientific law.
This is how a real scientist keeps nonsense from entering into science.
A real scientists has no beliefs. NONE. Beliefs are "things" like "folk lore" and "fairy tales", that have no evidence but are believed anyway. There is never any real full truth in beliefs. If they feed you partial truths to get you to believe, get away from them. And you never believe any teacher, any PHD and scientist until you have tested EVERYTHING they say. Never accept feculence like "evolutionary pressure" until you have seen this for yourself. If the pressure doesn't cause evolution into a totally new genus or extremely different morphology then it is not evolution.
In real science we only work with the evidence. You do not understand that testable, repeatable (millions of times and by any one) is science. If you can't test for something, then it is not science.
You cannot project belief on evidence.There is no evidence for evolution at all, and all the evidence only points to:
1/ Creatures appear.
2/ Creatures remain the same for millions of years.
3/ Creatures have gone extinct and looked exactly the same as when they came.
4/ All of the evidence we have on creatures now living and we have their fossils show no evolution, no changing morphology for 110 Million years for the crock, and 125 Million for the mosquito.
5/ There is no evidence in DNA of any evolution.
6/ There is no evolution taking place today. There are no transitional creatures. They all look the same as in the ancient fossils.
7/ There is only one set of conclusions to all the evidence:
This is all the facts we have, without opinions, and is based on absolute empirical, PHYSICAL, evidence:
A.Creatures come into existence with no trail of any evidence of any transition from anything that came before. Huge gaps are not to be filled in with faith and belief.
B. All prior versions look the same, but may be bigger, smaller and have a few differences, but is only reflective of the same foundational genetic coding.
C. All the fossil record shows is that creatures remained the same morphology for the entire time they exited and still exist.
D. They never break the boundaries of their foundational genetic coding.
E. Creatures adapt to the environment to survive as the same creatures. They never are forced to evolve by any "magical" process.
F. When the environment becomes to difficult for them to survive, they go extinct.
G. The dating system for replacement fossils is atrocious. It is based on too many assumptions and is not science at all. Dating the ground around the fossils is never the same as dating the bones with historical accuracy. There is no way to date replacement fossils ACCURATELY. This is why there are so many "out of place" fossils, and you cannot use any of the replacement fossil data with accuracy.
The mythology of this crap belief:
H. There is no such thing as evolutionary pressure that causes creatures to change into completely different species or genus (break the boundaries of their genetic coding).
I. Because there are similar DNA constructs in fish and in humans, for example, does not show any link between humans and fish. It only shows that there are only so many ways to construct body parts in all creatures. There are only so many minerals, so many proteans, so many elements, molecules on this earth. The Earth is finite, not infinite as these foolish, evodelusionsists, people try to imply.
J. Even when you separate a species for up to 2 million years it is possible for it to breed with the other separated species. Speciation and not being able to breed with a prior generation is not evidence of evolution. It is evidence of genetics.
--You, for example, may not be able to breed with an ancient human ancestor, because of the well known facts of genetics. People who mental masturbate about ways to show "evodelusion" will use crap like this to brainwash people.
K. If creatures remain the same as what they were, there is no evolutoin.
If it remains a lizard and looks the same, there is no evolution.
If it remains as a dog, no evolution.
If it remains as a human, no evolution.
If it remains as bacteria, no evolution.
If it remains as a fruit fly, no evolution.
Genetics, interbreeding, and hybridization is not evolution.
L. Speciation is not proof of evolution, but just how genetics works for the creatures to survive as the same creatures, as things in the environment change.
M. To have evolution, you must absolutely prove that creatures have evolved into a new genus or even a completely different member of a new species. There is no evidence of this on this planet.
N. ERV's only show a genetic links and interbreeding. It does not show any evolution no some prior creature that was the common ancestor (This is utter nonsense). You have to have physical evidence, (the actual mythological) creature with DNA to back this, and there is none. Without the belief this ERV "evidence" has many plausibilities and each refutes evolution. Evodelusionists never look at any that obviously refute their religious beliefs. These fools only allow what fits the belief and unfortunately there is plenty of evidence contrary to the belief.
===================================
Your analogy is worthless as all these screwy analogies used to brainwash children.
IF you were to actually open your eyes and not come from the brainwashing, what I teach is easy to see in ALL the evidence.
Now where is you absolute evidence "for" evolution? It must be physical, irrefutable, have no other plausibility and fits all the evidence perfectly. It must contain no opinions based on belief.
If you can refute anything I teach, you would have to be a magician. None of what I teach comes from any belief. It is based on what we actually have as evidence.