Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
  We've upgraded to YaBB 2!
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
How is this fair? (Read 15656 times)
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #15 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 12:53pm
 
Oicurmtoyoy wrote on Nov 23rd, 2010 at 10:51am:
Like I said, you merely deny evidence. I've given you the evidence many times, but you deny it's existence every time. When I make it abundantly clear, you say "that's an opinion". Instead of explaining how this is true, you simply elongate your statement.

You only claim that there is no evidence, but you have not demonstrated how the evidence we have presented can't be used. And mixing opinion up with reasoning isn't an explanation, it's just pure nonsense.

From what I've seen, you've taken arguments against religion and flipped them, around, using them where they aren't applicable. Maybe it's a coincidence, or maybe you have some other motive, a religious one perhaps. The point is;
Denying the existence of evidence is NOT a refutation


You are funny as hell! (and I don't believe in "hell")
Evolution by definition has not occurred. There is only de-evoluton from a better and more fit condition as is actually shown in evidence.

Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.

I look at the same evidence and make purely objective and logical observations. These observations have nothing to do with anything but scientific inquiry without any beliefs in anything but genetics and all the evidence as a whole.

You have not presented any objective evidence that "says" evolution is true or even suggested.
Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ProofMan
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Truth Found!

Posts: 15
England
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #16 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 7:09am
 
Here you go!
...

There! Proof!  Grin

As this is how you are expecting to see evolution happen here is your evidence. Cheesy

I would go on to explain why evolution doesnt happen like this but you will ignore it just like you are probably ignoring what I am typing already.

If you have such a high intellect why dont you use it to read, absorb and contribute to the discussion rather than copy&paste the same lines?

I would love to have a true discussion but so far all evidence of your tactics is that you are not open to discussion.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #17 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 10:28am
 
The problem with any discussion is dealing with faith and belief.   It is not possible to overcome brainwashed ignorance.

Since I have avoided all religious faith and belief, for my entire life, and I have studied science for my entire life.  I don't think you are ready to learn what I know. 

First you  need to read all that I have written.  Then when you come across something that you don't understand ask questions.

Don't make any statements unless you are willing to back them up with evidence. 

Simple.

So, far all I have gotten is this pile of BS.  "There is mountains of evidence for evolution."

I have had all of this evidence presented to me, and there is no evidence for this:

Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ProofMan
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Truth Found!

Posts: 15
England
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #18 - Apr 5th, 2011 at 1:53am
 
Ok on a more serious note:

You argue there is no Evolution on De-Evolution.

I wish to argue that what you are calling De-Evolution IS Evolution.

You say that you have seen that the human race is de-evolving from a more powerful specimen to a weaker one with a loss of DNA.

Question 1: Am I correct so far ?(from what I have read of yours, I am afraid I am at work currently so do not have time to flick back).


So if what I have read from you so far is correct then I wish to argue that this is Evolution to a more refined state.

We are gradually becoming less powerful with thinner bone and skull structure due to our progressive brain development.

As our intellect has increased our use of tools and weapons has developed. This means that with the use of weapons the weaker members of the primitive society were able to hold their ground and become adequate hunters and survivors thus meaning the genes for the less powerful structure and the weaker bone was passed down.

With todays tools and weaponry or even that available during the renaissance the puniest and most asthmatic of men would have had a “field leveller” meaning that they were able to compete with the biggest and strongest thus it was now those weaker individuals who were able to survive and probably more-so if their intellect was higher.

Question 2: Have you understood what I am trying to explain? I don’t mean this question in any malice or derogatory way I just wish to ensure my point is clear.


I look forward to your response and hope it is more in keeping with what I have suggested and discusses these points properly in a valid and scientific way rather than other replies I have seen where there was no discussion just child-like name calling between parties and denial without true cause.

Thank you
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #19 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 1:52am
 
ProofMan wrote on Apr 5th, 2011 at 1:53am:
Ok on a more serious note:

You argue there is no Evolution on De-Evolution.

I wish to argue that what you are calling De-Evolution IS Evolution.

You say that you have seen that the human race is de-evolving from a more powerful specimen to a weaker one with a loss of DNA.

Question 1: Am I correct so far ?(from what I have read of yours, I am afraid I am at work currently so do not have time to flick back).


So if what I have read from you so far is correct then I wish to argue that this is Evolution to a more refined state.

We are gradually becoming less powerful with thinner bone and skull structure due to our progressive brain development.

As our intellect has increased our use of tools and weapons has developed. This means that with the use of weapons the weaker members of the primitive society were able to hold their ground and become adequate hunters and survivors thus meaning the genes for the less powerful structure and the weaker bone was passed down.

With todays tools and weaponry or even that available during the renaissance the puniest and most asthmatic of men would have had a “field leveller” meaning that they were able to compete with the biggest and strongest thus it was now those weaker individuals who were able to survive and probably more-so if their intellect was higher.

Question 2: Have you understood what I am trying to explain? I don’t mean this question in any malice or derogatory way I just wish to ensure my point is clear.


I look forward to your response and hope it is more in keeping with what I have suggested and discusses these points properly in a valid and scientific way rather than other replies I have seen where there was no discussion just child-like name calling between parties and denial without true cause.

Thank you


This is the original definition based on the actual etymology of the word.
Evotards will take scientific terms and make them fit with the religious beliefs.
This is the ONLY real definition of evolution. Anything else is religious crap dogma.

Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.  ( I have this book.)

Your statement is not factual nor scientific at all it is wishful thinking.  Humans would love to think they are evolving to a better smarter species, but there is no evidence of that.

"We are gradually becoming less powerful with thinner bone and skull structure due to our progressive brain development."

The capacity of a brain for information and understanding as well as being aware of science is not pre-required to be used but to exist in the first place. Capacity is not knowledge.

If you take a genius human and lock them up with no books, no verbal communication and just feed them and hose them off when they are dirty,  then the capacity is still there, but it has not been used.

The Herto, is evidence of a superior cranial capacity.  You will not find many Evotards referring to the Herto, because it destroys the religion.

If you disregard the ridiculous methods that paleontologist use to date things and how badly they perform any calibration on any part of this, you will realize they are full of crap when it comes to the dating.   There is absolutely no way to verify any of their data. PERIOD. It is horrible use of assumptions and manipulated data.  They keep on searching the ground until they find the oldest radioactive elements.

Realizing that all we have are extremely poorly dated fossils that we have no idea how old they are, will help you a lot. There are some ideas you can use from DNA really to show the reduction.  It is like a historical map of genetic degradation.

Realizing that in all the DNA we have examined so far we see ONLY losses of genetic functions, atrophy, atavisms, and mutations that cause poor weak cell replication, diseases.  We have so many "new" diseases in the last century that have never been seen before.

The fact that chimps, gorillas, orangutans, have lost so much brain capacity as is shown in the DNA comparisons of humans to chimps is evidence of this.  They lost cranial size and brain functions as the proteans are lost and gone forever.  I hypothesize it was from living near volcanoes and lots of radioactive minerals.  The Macaque monkey loves to bath in radioactive volcanic pools. 

Pretty much all of the "hominids" are "retarded humans" and are dated horribly by the radiometric dating and other assumptions.

Take the skulls of the Herto, Human, Homo Erectus, Ergaster, Chimp. Gorilla, orangutan and Macaque monkey.
Place them in order of crainal distortion and you will see nothing but de-evolution from a larger brain capacity to smaller.  Humans are still a little larger but smaller crainium than Herto.
Chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, Macaqua are all much younger than humans.  The fact that we have so few specimins shows this. There is only one set of Chimp teeth fossils, much younger than Herto as best as we can date. The Gorilla is much younger than humans, so is the orangutan, and Macaqua monkey.  They have some serious DNA evidence of very close ties to our super-species ancestors.

All of them have the apparent skull remnants of the Herto.
The gorilla has a protrusion left where the skull was at one time rounded.

The original human species was far more fit, had a larger brain capacity, stronger thinker bones and much more dense muscle tissue. The chimp shows this as it is much stronger than a human now, retaining that protean in a much stronger form.

As we de-evolved from fit to the degenerates we are today, it is rare and a freak to find any real intelligence that is objective and capable of studying all that we have to offer and realizing what is going on.

The original human had a much more adaptive skin and had the ability to go very dark as needed in pigment. It had the ability to grow hair for warmth. The idea of hairy bodies would make sense prior to living in warm only climates and having clothing and shelter.

We did no evolve from a subspecies.  We have all de-evolved from a superior design to a frail and now pretty stupid species. There was a super-species of human prior to what we have now.

We are still killing each other, finding new ways to destroy the planet, oblivious to anything that is obvious, and are so wrapped up in survival issues still.  It is rare to find real intelligence.
We have millions of people and children going to bed hungry every night.  We kill and maim each other in the name of God.
We destroy the human genome in the name of "medicines" that screw up cell reproduction.
We constantly radiate our brains with various frequencies of radiation that we never had in nature.
We eat crap foods out of ignorance and laziness. 
We don't have the capacity to understand basic physics.  Instead we make up idiotic ideas that science doesn't need a cause. WTF is that about.

Our schools are producing dysfunctional, hateful, people.  They are so confused and filled with conflicting data it is a wonder they can wipe themselves at all. The lowest common denominator is the norm, to be "politically correct" we must not have any people who excel.  If we do we make them into freaks.

How can a scientist call themselves scientists when they remove "cause" from science?  There is no science without cause and effect. PERIOD.  Just because they are so weak minded they can't even attempt to find the cause, is no reason to pull the random card out of their asses and say with "authority" this is a random cause?

There is nothing on this planet without cause.

Some things to ponder.

 

Often the things that give us the most comfort and even feed us, are the things that are destroying our genome.

Look at these guys.
Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ProofMan
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Truth Found!

Posts: 15
England
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #20 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 2:11am
 
Loving the picture.

I am afraid I didnt explain myself properly.
I was not meaning cranial capacity in volume, purely the contents.

As we lived on this planet as one species or another or however you want to view it, our understandings grew in all aspects of life, such as the use of tools and the fashioning of clothes which is what I am posing as a reason for our physical weakening.

With a means for the weaker to survive why would only purely strong genes be decended?

With a method of covering ones body, why would hair and darker skin be of use? Especially as the species spread further north and south of the equator where climates are colder.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #21 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 2:51am
 
ProofMan wrote on Apr 6th, 2011 at 2:11am:
Loving the picture.

I am afraid I didnt explain myself properly.
I was not meaning cranial capacity in volume, purely the contents.

As we lived on this planet as one species or another or however you want to view it, our understandings grew in all aspects of life, such as the use of tools and the fashioning of clothes which is what I am posing as a reason for our physical weakening.

With a means for the weaker to survive why would only purely strong genes be decended?

With a method of covering ones body, why would hair and darker skin be of use? Especially as the species spread further north and south of the equator where climates are colder.


Once we left the ideal location for humans to live, we lost genetic features for survival.

In the north we lose the ability to deal with intense sun by atrophy of skin pigmentation.

We go south and the heat is intense and food is different.Clothing reduces the need for hair.
All are reductions in genetic information.

As far as intelligence, the seers from as far as 6000 years ago were far more intelligent than most people I have ever met.  They understood the human condition better than anyone I know of living today. 

Have you read the Aruvedic scriptures?  How about the Mosaic law?  That is only about 3000 years old.

How did anyone in those days know that you should not crap in your village, have sex in the anus with men, have sex with sisters and brothers?  All of those are found in science today as the only means they had to preserve the genetic lineage from defects and mutations caused by virus bacteria, fungus, and really bad interbreeding.

How did they know not to domesticate pigs?  Pigs are the breeding ground for extremely bad strains of virus that can kill and mutate humans.

We actually know that but we still are so degenerated we breed them and side by side with chickens.  And you think humans are smarter?

How did they know not to have sex with multiple partners was bad for propagating viral mutations that cause cancer and birth defects?

The development of antibiotics to fight off venereal diseases and bacteria mutations cause by some really stupid things that humans do is contradictory to genomic health.

We strengthen bacteria because we do stupid things that cause the bacteria to mutate in the first place, then we weaken our immune system.  How is that "evolution".

Morality has some pretty intelligent human preservation science in it. 

Because of human stupidity and compulsions we don't want morality to get in the way of "fun". So, we continue to do the stupidest crap to our bodies and we do all we can to speed up extinction.

Do you really think humans are smarter?  Have more wisdom?

We can barely wipe our asses and we think we have concurred science?  We don't even know what a human is.
We don't know what life is.

When you see a dead body, what was alive in it?  What made it alive?

I really have to go to bed.  It is late here.


Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ProofMan
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Truth Found!

Posts: 15
England
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #22 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:29am
 
Then our discussion will continue tomorrow.

I am thoroughly enjoying this as we are keeping away from degenerative name calling and having true discussions.


In the north we lose the ability to deal with intense sun by atrophy of skin pigmentation.

Quote:
We go south and the heat is intense and food is different.Clothing reduces the need for hair.
All are reductions in genetic information.


In a way I do understand what you mean and yes it is a reduction in genetic information, but that reduction lead us to be better adapted to that climate with the redundant information then being discarded.

So are we able to agree that over time our species has adapted to its surroundings and has discarded the DNA that, at that time, it no longer had any use for?

I do understand the basis for your views and find it fascinating so I am trying to establish common ground between us.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #23 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:05pm
 
ProofMan wrote on Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:29am:
Then our discussion will continue tomorrow.

I am thoroughly enjoying this as we are keeping away from degenerative name calling and having true discussions.


In the north we lose the ability to deal with intense sun by atrophy of skin pigmentation.

Quote:
We go south and the heat is intense and food is different.Clothing reduces the need for hair.
All are reductions in genetic information.


In a way I do understand what you mean and yes it is a reduction in genetic information, but that reduction lead us to be better adapted to that climate with the redundant information then being discarded.

So are we able to agree that over time our species has adapted to its surroundings and has discarded the DNA that, at that time, it no longer had any use for?

I do understand the basis for your views and find it fascinating so I am trying to establish common ground between us.


Losing skin pigment, or gaining darker skin is neutral as far as diseases as long as you stay and don't migrate to where you need it.  Loss of pigment can help with cancer if the northern, white, people move south or to high altitudes with high UV or the sun ever becomes intense in the UK, Holland, Germany, Norway, Sweden etc.  It is better if they stay in the 50th parallel or start interbreeding with Sherpas, orientals from Tibet or India, Middle easterners or  Blacks, Greeks and Italians.  Those traits can be mixed back in.

The blacks in America are showing a gradual decline in sickle cell anemia, by interbreeding it away.  It seems that weak genetics is overpowered by the stronger and more healthy in the interbreeding process.  The best, strongest athletes we have today are mixed race.  Blacks with mixed white oriental, southern European and Middle eastern  blood seem to dominate sports.

Natural events are not the problem with our genome. It is the events we were never to have to deal with that are killing us off.
Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #24 - Apr 6th, 2011 at 3:19pm
 
Another image for you showing the genetic links to monkeys.

Back to top
 

A_Macaque.jpg (49 KB | 260 )
A_Macaque.jpg

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Itseasyifyouthink
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


Seek Truth!

Posts: 2
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #25 - Jun 14th, 2011 at 11:07am
 
Hey, I've been reading these two pages of scrape you guys put down, and I have a few comments.
First of all, Goodscienceforyou, no offense, but i notice that all too commonly you write people off who dissagree with you as "indoctrinated into the "Religion" of evolution, weak minded, and helpless when effected by social coersion." I mean, I think all of us are effected by at least a small portion of those things, but in all reality I think it's fairly balanced. Also, i think it's a bit too easy to just say that about someone. I mean, honestly, i think you are all those things even more than i, but i dont go shoving it in your face, because i want to see how far i can go logically and evidence-wise before we hit a wall. Obviously, there can be little to gain from one another when both parties believe the other to be indoctrinated and closed-minded. However, I hope that in our correspondences, we can be rid of these accusations and let the evidence do the talking. That way, the person with the best evidence, sources, and logic will prevail, not emotions and banter. I propose a battle of evidence, with identified, truthfull, scientific sources. This will lead (i hope) to a more balanced, fact based confrontation, rather than one where both sides can go nowhere. I am relatively new to this forum having created an account today, so you will excuse me for perhaps putting comments in the wrong places. Oh, also, as a last note, i noticed that this site is for balanced, open minded, free minded discussion about evolution and its successes and faults. In light of this, i would (if it were my place) suggest eliminating much of the bias in  your statements and comments about videos (namely childish things that have no place, like "evolutards" and evodelusionists") however cleverly they are thought of. Because, as we know, adults dont need condescending remarks about their scientific/religious stances.
Lastly, i would like to share with you my admiration for your search for truth and a mind free of bias from society. It is a noble goal indeed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GoodScienceForYou
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


The obvious isn't obvious
until it is obvious

Posts: 1361
United States
Gender: male
Re: How is this fair?
Reply #26 - Jun 16th, 2011 at 5:07am
 
Itseasyifyouthink wrote on Jun 14th, 2011 at 11:07am:
Hey, I've been reading these two pages of scrape you guys put down, and I have a few comments.
First of all, Goodscienceforyou, no offense, but i notice that all too commonly you write people off who dissagree with you as "indoctrinated into the "Religion" of evolution, weak minded, and helpless when effected by social coersion." I mean, I think all of us are effected by at least a small portion of those things, but in all reality I think it's fairly balanced. Also, i think it's a bit too easy to just say that about someone. I mean, honestly, i think you are all those things even more than i, but i dont go shoving it in your face, because i want to see how far i can go logically and evidence-wise before we hit a wall. Obviously, there can be little to gain from one another when both parties believe the other to be indoctrinated and closed-minded. However, I hope that in our correspondences, we can be rid of these accusations and let the evidence do the talking. That way, the person with the best evidence, sources, and logic will prevail, not emotions and banter. I propose a battle of evidence, with identified, truthfull, scientific sources. This will lead (i hope) to a more balanced, fact based confrontation, rather than one where both sides can go nowhere. I am relatively new to this forum having created an account today, so you will excuse me for perhaps putting comments in the wrong places. Oh, also, as a last note, i noticed that this site is for balanced, open minded, free minded discussion about evolution and its successes and faults. In light of this, i would (if it were my place) suggest eliminating much of the bias in  your statements and comments about videos (namely childish things that have no place, like "evolutards" and evodelusionists") however cleverly they are thought of. Because, as we know, adults dont need condescending remarks about their scientific/religious stances.
Lastly, i would like to share with you my admiration for your search for truth and a mind free of bias from society. It is a noble goal indeed.



I respond to people based on the evidence.  If they are full of crap and will not even have a two way conversation then they go away quickly. These are the religious fanatics.

Since in my long life of science, I have never, NEVER found any empirical, objective evidence for evolution, it makes me question the sanity of those who believe in this.

When I was quite young I realized quickly that people are brainwashed into beliefs based on nothing but a desire for it to "be that way". 

Wouldn't it be nice if God used evolution to create humans?  Bla Bla Bla! 

The facts are against any form of evolution, only genetics and the original design of the creature that was set free on this planet.  And it voilates the other laws of science.

There is no other science where magical occurances are the "answer" to the cause.

When the Evotards were free to make up crap, and they created the "science" they degraded biology more than any  other science, because the evidence could be "interpreted" by them who were in charge of the evidence. 

The wolves guarding the chicken house. 

Now we have little children believing in this crap before they take on science class, because "mommy and daddy" believe.
The cartoon shows on TV show fantasy creatures (that never existed) as if they were real.

It is a sickness of society to believe in pseudo science that has never had any evidence that shows this as possible.

I realized that fuddy duddies were out in the field projecting belief on fossils and they were faking data, because they all do the same crap. The first guy finds the evidence and proclaims what it is. Then the experts "correct" his misinterpretations. Every friggin time in my 42 years of reading each and every "finding".

It is a well protected religious cult that makes a lot of money. It, like all religious human garbage beliefs,  has infiltrated academia, because it can and it is a popular ideology and it makes lots of money.

The people who get paid to perpetuate this BS are the enemies of science and ultimately the enemies of truth and for humanity to ever find the truth.

Here it is in a nutshell

Evolution:  "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character."  Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.

...



Back to top
 

"Putting your faith in humanity has historically not been a good concept. Why do you think it is "different" now?"
"Find the truth for yourself and don't succumb to indoctrination."
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print