Hey Thanks for writing;


My comments on the internet at there to get attention to my work to clean up and straighten out science and biological science, while I am still on this planet; and get rid of ridiculous nonsense that has already been shown to not exist.

How the universe was started (short version) according to all the evidence we actually have:

The universe started one place in space. We can see that the unverse has a center and all the matter is expanding from that point in space.
It is also accelerating because we can see that by the light spectrum of the "bodies" in space.

The original element that came into existence was "H" hydrogen ,because it is one electron and one proton.  All of life is made from that basic energy.  One positive and one negative.
E=MC 2  This has been proven by a lab in Europe a couple of years ago.  Energy is matter and matter is energy.  Energy came first and when it is put in motion it has mass. All mass comes from pure energy in motion. There are also some "pieces of sub atomic" energy constructs that are not fully mass.  This is what the physicists "accelerated" until they had mass.

It became massive, immeasurable and unfathomable by the human mind, amounts of this hydrogen element and nobody knows why.  But it has a CAUSE, because all of science is based on CAUSE and RESULT.

Then the Hydrogen atoms  became collected together in one place and under unmeasurable pressure through the concentration of immeasurable force towards a single point in space, it started to fuse (nuclear fusion) and the majority of the elements were created by this process. The Electrons collected in the area around the nucleus and the nucleus gained more positive charges and some negative got in there to create the "neutrons" which are neutral because of one electron bonded directly to one neutron. There is no separate "neutron" it is actually composed of tightly bonded electrons to the neutron in the center of the atoms.

The complex atoms of the natural elements are just a fusion of hydrogen caused by this process.

The charges are equal and opposite. EXACTLY equal and opposite in polarity.   There must be to be this balance in energy for life to function.

After this fusion process, this huge fusion bomb exploded as the elements became fully developed and because the solids caused by this process cannot be compressed any further the only thing it can do is to explode in a massive explosion that drove out all this mass from the center of the Universe.

I developed this theory in 1962 when I was 16 and have been watching the progress of scientists to show that it is valid.

They still think there is a separate thing called a neutron but it is really just an electron attached directly to a proton.  They have not figured that out yet, but they will.

This can only be a directed process by intelligence because it is too deliberate to be anything else and the final concepts of matter were in the "seed" at the beginning.  In other words the end of the process was known at the beginning otherwise these elements would not be exactly as they are.  It is not some accident it has a cause.  All of science is based on CAUSE, not accidents or random.

There is nothing in the natural world that does not have a cause.  All of life is causal. When morons don't understand the obvious, they make up crap.

The foundation of science is cause and effect or cause and result.  Any "science" that overlooks the primary law of science, is a religion of morons.

Now, these bodies of massive collections of energy as matter, expanded and deliberately formed into the universe as we see it now and as we can see it in the past from observations.

The elements that we find on earth that are unstable, "radioactive" were established here under the pressure of a fusion taking place inside the earth and are expelled under pressure in a volcano.  This the "little bang" theory, because these elements could not withstand time and so they could not have come from the first fusion at the center of the universe.

These unstable elements are unstable because the earth does not have enough pressure to make them stable. They collect under "weak" pressure and  so they are in a state of constant "falling apart"; called nuclear decay.

e=mc2: 103 years on, Einstein proved right
Friday, 21 November 2008
Agence France-Presse

Credit: iStockphoto



Related articles
Exotic new particles discovered
Envisaged by Einstein, photon trap is built
Einstein was wrong: Brownian speed can be measured
Einstein is still right on time
Atom smasher closes in on 'God particle'
PARIS: Einstein's celebrated formula e=mc2 has been corroborated (again), thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.

A brainpower consortium led by Laurent Lellouch of France's Centre for Theoretical Physics, using some of the world's mightiest supercomputers, have set down the calculations for estimating the mass of protons and neutrons, the particles at the nucleus of atoms.

Energy and mass are equivalent

According to the conventional model of particle physics, protons and neutrons comprise smaller particles known as quarks, which in turn are bound by gluons.

The odd thing is this: the mass of gluons is zero and the mass of quarks is only five percent. Where, therefore, is the missing 95 per cent?

The answer, according to the study published in the U.S. journal Science today, comes from the energy from the movements and interactions of quarks and gluons.

In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. The e=mc2 formula shows that mass can be converted into energy, and energy can be converted into mass.

Last year a different stream of evidence from particle accelerators also corroborated the theory (see, Einstein is still right on time). Yet another study of pulsars backed-up Einstein's General Theory of Relativity in 2006 (see, The stars say Einstein was 99.95 per cent right).

Inspiration for atomic weapons

By showing how much energy would be released if a certain amount of mass were to be converted into energy, the equation has been used many times, most famously as the inspirational basis for building atomic weapons.

But resolving e=mc2 at the scale of sub-atomic particles – in equations called quantum chromodynamics – has been fiendishly difficult.

"Until now, this has been a hypothesis," France's National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) said proudly in a press release. "It has now been corroborated for the first time."

For those keen to know more: the computations involve "envisioning space and time as part of a four-dimensional crystal lattice, with discrete points spaced along columns and rows."