bevolve wrote on Oct 23rd, 2011 at 2:16pm:So I got your invite, and here I am. I would like to approach this a little differently than you may be used to, so that we may be able to have a conversation without devolving into each writing huge responses responding selectively to what the previous one said and obscuring the point.
Therefore, my suggestion is that we start with one specific point, deliberate on that, and then, and then move on if we can come to a conclusion.
I would like to start by calling under question your previous statement: "it would take at least 51% positive mutations for evolution to occur".
As concisely as possible, can you explain your reasoning behind this statement?
Thank you for coming by.
I never allow anyone to tell me how to respond. People always want to control the conversation to preserve their beliefs.
I just give the absolute facts and teach people how to get free, literally, how to learn how to learn.
Here is the reason. The original definition of evolution was and still is all about ONLY advancement leading to the eventual evolution of complex creatures from less complex and less fit. This is the fantasy of this mythological religion.
In order to have any advancement with added complexity,added intelligence, increased fitness and more ability to survive. You would need to have 51% positive mutations that would add this magical evolution to any creature. You could be more precise, and say 50.0000001% as a start. But 51% means that increase could be possible.
Since the nature of mutations do not ever allow this as a possibility, and only shows genetic losses in complex, meaning multi- cellular creatures, then there is no science of evolution.
The real science of genetics has nothing in common with this religious idea that humans evolved from fish as is the faith and belief of the religion of evolution.
Evolution: "that theory which sees in the history of all things organic and inorganic a development from simplicity to complexity, a gradual advance from a simple or rudimentary condition to one that is more complex and of a higher character." Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English Language.
In every instance of speciation there is genetic loss, less ability to adapt, and less fitness, more finite foods, less ability
to adapt to the environment and the eventual extinction as is seen in all the extinct creatures.
This magical idea of evolution has been destroyed by the evidence in DNA.
For the last 150 years or so, people have believed in this religious myth, and have forced this belief on academia as a pop cultural pseudo science that is accepted as if it was real, because so many believe in it.
They believe because it is indoctrinated into their minds by continual brainwashing. TV, peers, teachers, parents all believe in this magical nonsense, but it is nothing but faith and belief forced on the world as any religious ideology.
The concept of "It must be real, if all the scientists accept it." is one of the oldest piles of human faith and belief forms there is.
I don't know how to be more concise, but DNA is absolutely irrefutable physical evidence that only shows genetic loss, pseudo genes, atavism, and poor cell replication from incorrect DNA codons, that produce incorrect and less functional cells.
The nature of reality is that when a mutation survives it weakens the species. It has never added any complexity brain capacity, nor health, longevity, nor any of the magical ideas of "evolution".
Once you realize this then all the other evidence fits perfectly with it.
In real science we wait for the absolutely irrefutable, obvious, clear, physical evidence and then make conclusions.
In real science we do not just force beliefs on evidence.
This Video is based on evidence that cannot be denied. It is how mutations actually work.
It is impossible for mutations to lend a net positive result, when they are between 70% according to the beliefs of published accredited PhD's to 99.9% deleterious, based on actual evidence.