ThunderF00tslefttesticle wrote on Jan 17^th, 2010 at 11:25pm:


I have asked this guy thunderfoot to do a one on one with me in public and on video, so I can straighten out his nonsense.

This guy is so stupid that it is hard to think that people listen to him.

Don't put nonsense opinions in front of me again.  I do not want nonsense.  Understand.

You do not understand what evidence is.  You have been brainwashed and are weak willed if you think that arguing with creationists is the way to achieve enlightenment.

Arguing with creationist is a sign of insanity and weak arguments. Creationists are not scientists for the most part. They are projecting as well what they want to believe.

There is no scientific evidence for creation, nor for evolution, both are religious in nature. All religious nonsense needs to be removed from science. Take you nonsense beliefs and start a religion with it and indoctrinate your children far away from public schools.

I really suggest that you start reading the posts on here before you post again, so you can start to understand what real knowledge is.  If you want to be free, don't believe any of these dumb asses, and learn how to learn.

I will give you a slight education on what evolution does.

If you take a variety of organisms and 1% of the organisms have an immunity to a particular illness and that illness hits, do you agree that the overall organisms with the immunity is going to increase in percentage? A good example is the CCR5 delta 32 gene. This gene was found in less than 1% of Europeans. When the black plague hit, the number increased to 10%. Why? Because it protected against the black plague. Those who survived it were able to reproduce and had children who had the immunity. This dramatically effected the number of individuals who had the gene. This is one part of evolution in action. The gene is not an adaptation because in order for it to be an adaptation, the environment must be present prior to the development of the gene. This gene came into being by itself many many years prior to the existence of the black plague.

Here is another example of a good mutations. Can you explain this if this is not evolution in action?

http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/13/mutation-leads-to-super-dense-bones/

This is a video from an 'actual' biologist about mutations. Enjoy.

http://www.scottklarr.com/topic/162/8th-foundation-falsehood-of-creationism---mutations-and-genetic-information/

Evodelusionism is a religion, that is commonly called "The Theory of Evolution"  with the following precepts and dogma.

1/ Only the high priests of the cult are allowed to tell you how to think and what evodelusion is.  They present the dogma, and if you don't believe you are cast out from the "intellectual" status if you don't cave into all they teach you. If you think for yourself or question the faith and belief, you are made an example of and your career in biology is ruined.

2/ The peers are just as nasty.  If you don't cave into the belief, you will be put down as "stupid", "cretard", "unscienific", and a plain old "loser". The pressure to conform is extremely strong. Which is why there are so many weak people in this religion. You are not allowed to question the faith and belief in this Evodelusionism religion.

3/ In pop culture, the societies which are mostly people who have been forced to belief this crap, because "All the great minds of our time believe in evolution and think it is fact."  Most of the people in the culture have never really studied this crap, so they just believe for no reason other than the "scientists" tell them it is real.  The "scientists"
are spawn from 1 and 2 above.

4/ The basic dogma is this; 

A.That life started by "random" accident.  That there is no God and no designer and no intelligence behind all of this amazing universe. That by the big bang "random accident" where nothing existed, all of the universe came into being. Random events caused life.

(Clue: There is no random in this universe.  The number one law of science that all science "runs" on is cause and effect. Random would negate all causes and all effects and leave us in chaos.)

B.That from this random start the entire universe was created and designed by no intelligence and that means that living creatures and plant life started by random accident as well.  From no life, life got it's start.

C. That the first creatures were very small tiny one celled creatures that "evolved" and became larger creatures and formed things like muscles, nerves, spines, digestive ability,eyes, ears, taste, and motor skills to move about.  That the first creatures were marine life. (That all humans are really evolved from fish)

D. That the marine life eventually grew legs, lungs, feet and learned to walk on land for no apparent reason.  It was a "random" and totally chaotic, illogical event.   That these fish decided that they needed to walk on land.

E. That eventually, these walking fish, became reptiles, lizards and such.

F. That these reptiles eventually became mammals and birds.

G. That these reptiles split off and speciated into new geneses all over the world. That these reptiles, mammals and birds, decided that they can break all the laws of genetics and become all the many creatures we have today and those that came before and are extinct.

H. That humans came from a line of "rats" that eventually became lemurs, then apes and eventually humans were produced by this "evolutionary processes". That all monkeys are our close relatives.

I. They believe that when a creature has these little DNA changes to their cells that it proves evolution is real.  The idea is to project this fantasy on all the living creatures they can find. That tiny changes in the genome equal the ability, eventually to transform into a whole new genus and start a new lineage of species off that genus.

Since not one single premise has ever been tested or even shown to suggest evolution, by any scientific experiment, you would think that by now this religion would be gone from science.  

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Jan 18^th, 2010 at 9:30am:


Instead you attack others' intelligence with nonsense, and expect them to "take the ride" with you.

GoodScienceForYou wrote on Jan 18^th, 2010 at 9:30am:

How else would you explain the ERV evidence, avoiding "human emotional mental garbage beliefs and opinions"? What other "plausibilities" can you come up with?

Dabeer wrote on Jan 18^th, 2010 at 9:40am:




[url]

http://evolutionforum.info/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1257966781

[/url]

I've found something that defines Goodscienceforyou's modus operandi.

Here

I'm sorry to say, I've never read so much nonsense as here in the last two days.

ThunderF00tslefttesticle wrote on Jan 19^th, 2010 at 12:42am:



If you are a true scientist and listened to only the facts in the videos, you will see lots of evidence for breeding and why it was possible.
Humans at that time had 48 Chromosomes according to the markers in the telomeres.
Chimps have 48 Chromosomes and 94.6% (according to evolutionists) the same DNA construction.
The ERV's are matched beyond any possibility of accidental genetic connection.  This is too close for a pair of creatures separated by millions of years, according to the first and only chimp fossil has been dated to.

You start thinking and stop believing in things.

When you come up against obvious study and observations of this "Theory of Evolution" you come up against me.

At some point what I teach will reach a small part of you because you still have the ability to understand the truth on some level.

When that happens, you are starting to make a breakthrough to getting free of having you mind owned by other people's combined beliefs, known as mythological religion. Do you like "belonging" or "being owned" by other people?

If you just go with what I teach and run with these concepts you will get free.