GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 21st, 2010 at 10:07pm:Since there is no irrefutable, absolutely real evidence for evolution, there is no reason to give it any energy or even a fart's worth of you time.
See, this is where you mess up - We're talking about the manipulation of words, not the theory of evolution; that will come later once we've sorted out these FUNDAMENTAL claims.
How can I trust what you say about ToE, when you can't even tell me where
your own evidence comes from? Not only that, you don't even attempt to justify your claims despite requiring this of everyone else on this board and resort to dismissing it out of hand as if it doesn't matter. It's vital - If the words
have been manipulated, you should be able to show us where and when this was done. If they haven't, all of your theories are suspect.
You claim to be a teacher, but you resort back to the banal statement about no truth in evolution when confronted with a dispute over your own claims. Instead of validating your ideas, you show them to be risible.
What I asked for is simply where you got your information from (why you find this insulting is perplexing, yet telling) and instead of answering and giving the evidence, like you expect the proponents of evolution to do, you resort to more obfuscation. Why is that?
You state that the words in the first post have been manipulated and changed, yet you provide NO evidence whatsoever, in fact you have SPECIFICALLY avoided giving us the evidence of the manipulation, despite your claims to be the one of the *only* honest scientists.
Without this evidence, you have no credibility. Do you see?
I haven't disputed your theories yet, only asked for the data you have pertaining to the changes you claim happened - why won't you answer?
As I see it, there are only two reasons:
1) You have no evidence (irrefutable or otherwise) and you only have an opinion, which destroys many, if not all, of your other claims or
2) The evidence you have would not stand up to even the the lightest of scrutiny, which destroys your claims of said changes and makes you a, if not a liar, an untrustworthy source.
Quote:Go back and read the original post, until you understand.
My ability to understand seems to greatly exceed your own, so I think YOU need to read the original post and give me some evidence to show that you are not just making this stuff up as you go along.
Quote:It is a hard one for dumb ass believers to get.
No, it's not - so far you have made claims that are unsubstantiated (something you take great pleasure in accusing others of) and you offer nothing whatsoever to back them up. If you cannot show where and when these words were changed or manipulated, they MUST have ONLY their original definitions, in which case all of your theories are bunk because you've made the concept fundamental to your ideology. It's not my fault you can't think on your feet.
Now, with all that said, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt; take some time and collect the evidence you claim exists (without anecdotes from your childhood or any bovine feculence or opinions) and I will review it.
I'm nothing, if not fair.