72DEW2 wrote on Apr 15th, 2012 at 12:16pm:sorry, i've been gone for a while.
look, dont preach god to me, i looked at one of your posts and you said you dont believe in god. i dont care what you think about humanity and neither should you because that has nothing to do with any science, it's mere personal preference.
this is becoming a novel again so i'm going to keep it short as i'm getting extremely demotivated to reply and annoyed by the fact that you keep repeating yourself how emotional and contemptuous you feel on humanity, politics... because i dont care. instead of of presenting factual data, you dilute every sentence with "retarded" "evoltards" and "evolution is religion" crap, i dont get offended but this shows purely that you are arguing on the basis of emotion.
i'll keep it simple, one of many evidence for evolution: an experiment (i believe i've told you this before and you fail to address) a 21 year experiment of E.Coli culture. go do your own research on that experiment and do your own analysis on the results because i really dont want copy & paste to you what i've written before.
You must know that I have read this entire paper by Linski. It is an attempt to show evolution, but it did not.
In the Linski experiment the e-coli did not evolve. It remains as bacteria. Bacteria is known to adapt to any carbon based foods, but it has never evolved.
In order to show the possibility of added complexity (the only definition of evolution) the only path of evolution would be to add features and new functions from new cells.
I question anyone who thinks that bacteria which has actually shown a weakening from many millions of years ago when it could withstand boiling water, is evolution. It is exactly the opposite with lots of stability along the way.
I do believe in God. God = Truth
The truth is humans are degrading rapidly. Humans are not bacteria. A horse is not bacteria a mouse, dog, elephant, nor Rhinoceros.
All mammals have de-evolved from far stronger conditions.
The giraffe is often maligned for its laryngeal nerve. The fact that it shows only genetic degradation from de-evolution doesn't enter the mind of "Evotards". This is from Dawkins nonsense video:
"This video, including comments by Richard Dawkins, documents a necropsy (an autopsy on an animal other than a human) carried out in a classroom on a giraffe. In this video, we follow the pathway of the recurrent (inferior) laryngeal nerve, an important nerve that is a branch of the Vagus nerve (tenth cranial nerve). The recurrent (inferior) laryngeal nerve, which branches off the Vagus nerve at the base of the brain, travels down the neck, around the arteries of the heart and travels back up the neck to ennervate the larynx, or voice box, thereby providing motor function. The purpose of doing this exercise is to show that there is no so-called "intelligent designer" because the pathway of this nerve is completely illogical -- unless, of course, you accept that evolution is the reason for this nerve's convoluted pathway through the body."
The logical conclusion is that 1/ the length of a nerve would have almost no restriction on function because it uses electrical impulses which travel at "lightening" speed. 2/ This has no affect on the survival ability of the giraffe. The giraffe still lives today even with this genetic defect that is a result of negative "evolution". It won't be long before it is gone too.
There are 47,000 creatures on the endangered species list....1 in 4 mammals.
We will be there in a relatively short time at our present rate of genetic degradation.