GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 9th, 2010 at 1:23pm:Random is imaginary, like the tooth fairy, and flying elephants on cartoons.
And with that, you completely disprove your statement that you believe only things that have been absolutely proven.
No legitimate scientist would ever make such an absolute statement about something for which there is insufficient evidence. There is no absolute proof for the claim that true random cannot possibly exist.
GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 9th, 2010 at 1:23pm:This is how intelligent you are?
So far you are not doing very well.
You should be saying this to yourself.
GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 9th, 2010 at 1:23pm:Why do you allow people to control your mind with delusional magical crap like "random".
Yeah... instead, you should let GSFY control your mind with delusional magical crap like chimpanzees resulting from crossbreeding between humans and gorillas, and diamond being something other than carbon.
GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 9th, 2010 at 1:23pm:Do you understand?
We do, obviously you don't.
Determinism means that there is a cause for every effect.
Non-determinism means that there are uncaused effects - in other words, truly random events.
You have spent pages arguing in favor of strict determinism, although you claim otherwise.
What you are failing to understand is that the word "random" in scientific parlance
does not mean strict non-determinism. We are
not claiming that anything in the Theory of Evolution requires non-determinism. We are saying, and you are failing to understand, that science uses the word
random to mean that the causes for the events are either not known, or beyond our current capability to calculate, and either way are simply not predictable with any reliable degree of accuracy.
What you are also failing to understand is that,
even if random meant "non-deterministic", that would still have
absolutely zero impact on the Theory of Evolution other than to change our statements from "random genetic errors" to "unpredictable genetic errors". It would do
nothing to invalidate the Theory as a whole.
If you want to disprove the Theory of Evolution, you're going to have to spend your energy on other angles of attack, because this one is a big non-starter.
"Determinism" means there is an intelligent cause for every event and it is controlled by some deity. I have not seen that in my lifetime. There is only the laws of physics "for ever action there is an equal and opposite reaction". As you express so you get it back.