GoodScienceForYou wrote on Feb 5th, 2010 at 3:11pm:Are you a troll? You don't make any logical sense.
Oh, so now that you are unable to answer my questions, you are calling me a troll? I, who have tried discussing with you on an adult level.
Quote:Just pointing your finger at an electron beam will cause it to deflect.
Who doesn't make any logical sense, again?
Quote:Are you here just to help the Evodelusionists to continue to destroy biological science?
I have said this to you many times before, but I will say it again: I do not know too much about Evolution yet, and I searched some forums to learn and discuss. I found out that this forum was not one of the places to take seriously.
Quote:How many of Einstein's theories have been proven?
None.
Quote:As far a I know only one.
Which one? The special theory of relativity or the general theory of relativity? If you again will write down e=mc^2, I will most definately laug my a** off. You're warned.
Einstein published about 300 articles, including some papers on quantum mechanics.
You failed to answer any of my questions. If you understood and knew the answer, it would take 2 minutes to write them down, but you didn't, and I know why.
Quote:There is no such thing as random in physics. It is only a term that can be used in abstract math and HAS NEVER BEEN applied to physics in any way.
"Random" is NOT used in abstract math, but very concrete math like statistics and analysis. You do not know what abstract math is. You call it abstract math because you do not understand it. The definition of abstract math is NOT: "
Math that is out there", like you think. Abstract math is about how it is presented, not the content and the results. There is an abstract way to do math and there is a more concrete way. THe abstract math seeks to generalize and axiomatize the mathematics involved, such that it can be applied to MORE! Of course abstract math has been used in physics. You told me you read Einstein (was it one paper only? Or one formula?), and obviously abstract math is involved. Stop quoting the man if he is such an idiot. Even linear algebra has an abstract way of being presented. Actually in most courses it is presented abstractly with axioms of vector spaces. That IS abstract, but yet VERY real.
Quote:even in Quantum Physics, we DON'T KNOW if events are truly random, or if there is some underlying cause that we simply don't know of, or aren't capable of detecting (yet).
We don't really know anything with 100% certainty, contrary to what GSFY says. I have never claimed this with 100% certainty. However, if the uncertainty principle is true (which seems very likely), then we can never say anything for sure about a particles momentum and position. If we measure momentum with very much accuracy, we know less about position and vice versa. Since we never can determine with 100% certainty (no matter how hard we try), this is for us random, since we cannot determine it. In all of this, the following is important: This is NOT a statement about our inability to do experiments and measurements. It is a statement about nature itself.